Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-09-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

To begin with, there are several reasons why this topic is important in our daily life. The main reason is that [TOPIC] can have a direct effect on people and society. Many people face this issue in their daily lives, and it can influence their lifestyle in different ways. For example, it may affect people’s work, education, health, or relationships. In addition, young people and families can also be influenced by this situation. Another important point is that [TOPIC] can have both positive and negative effects. It mainly depends on how people use it and how they deal with the situation.

Moreover, there are some possible ways to improve the situation. People should have proper knowledge and should make responsible decisions. The government, schools, and families can also play an important role by providing guidance and support. For instance, simple rules and better awareness can help people make better choices.

In conclusion, [TOPIC] is an important issue that should not be ignored. If people and society work together, the negative effects can be reduced and the situation can be improved.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 3.0

The student's response fails to address the specific topic of tourism, its economic benefits, and the damage it causes to local cultures and the environment. Instead, the essay relies entirely on generic template phrases containing placeholders like '[TOPIC]' and platitudes about daily life, young people, and government support. As a result, the response is largely off-topic and fails to present a clear position or develop any relevant ideas pertaining to the prompt. Furthermore, the length requirement has not been met, as the response contains only 180 words, falling significantly short of the 250-word minimum. This severely impacts the task achievement score, resulting in a band 3.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.0

Despite the lack of relevant content, the essay maintains a basic logical structure with an introduction, body paragraph, and conclusion. Transitional markers such as 'To begin with', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are used to connect sentences and paragraphs. However, paragraphing is basic, and the heavy reliance on templated, vague sentences means that the overall flow feels mechanical and disconnected from any real argumentative progression. Referencing is unclear due to the unfulfilled '[TOPIC]' placeholders. Based on these organizational attempts combined with structural flaws, a band 4.0 is appropriate.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.0

The vocabulary used throughout the response is extremely repetitive, basic, and generalized, such as 'important issue', 'positive and negative effects', and 'better choices'. Because the essay relies on template structures featuring '[TOPIC]', there is no domain-specific vocabulary related to tourism, economics, environmental impact, or cultural preservation. While the words used are generally spelled correctly, the lexical range is severely restricted and inadequate for an Academic Task 2 response. This performance aligns with the descriptors for a band 4.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates control over simple sentence structures and basic complex forms, such as 'The main reason is that [TOPIC] can have a direct effect on people and society' and 'If people and society work together, the negative effects can be reduced'. Grammatical errors are relatively infrequent in the simple sentences produced, and punctuation is generally handled correctly. However, the grammatical range is limited due to the repetitive syntax and lack of advanced structures. Because the actual language produced is mostly accurate despite being templated, a band 5.0 is awarded.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.