Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

This is the ongoing debate, the tourism increasing the economy of the country and this is the quickly increasing industry in all over the world despite this benefit they destroy the local tradition and also the environment. I am totally disagree with that they damage the culture.

Overall, tourism is the best source of income of every country and tourist is the way to represent your country.The individuals were attracted the country beauty and tradition after that they made a plan to visit the place they like. For example, when visitor enter the country they looked the country and admire with the nature in that country and then they went backed their country they told about the country people behaivours with their people and also showed the videos of breathtaking scenes of the country that's the way country representation through the visitors.

On the other hand, those people thought that tourists made the pollution and also damaged the surrounded this is the fact but this thing is not the solution to disallowed the tourism not visits our country moreover, this is bad impression about the country in all over the globe.

Finaly, the vistors is the best and fatest way to improve economy and represent the country in front of the other countries. I believe other country habitats should be allowed to come to look the different cultures and traditions of country this is the way to boost economy and main hand in the development. In addition, government should be make sure the security system for tourists.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a clear general preference for tourism, especially in the conclusion, where you say visitors should be allowed to experience different cultures and that tourism can boost the economy. You also acknowledge the opposing concern that tourists cause pollution. However, the response only partly answers the question about damage to both local cultures and the environment: cultural harm is dismissed rather than explained, and environmental damage receives little discussion. The example about visitors sharing videos and describing local people illustrates promotion of the country, but does not support your position on the potential harms. Develop both sides of the issue with specific reasons and examples, and state consistently how far you agree or disagree.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic essay shape, with an opening, two body paragraphs signalled by “Overall” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion beginning “Finally.” These markers help readers recognise shifts in focus. However, the progression of ideas is not always clear: the first body paragraph mainly explains how visitors promote a country, while the next briefly mentions pollution without developing the point. Some links are mechanical or imprecise, such as “despite this benefit” and “moreover,” and the long opening sentence joins several ideas without clear separation. Organise each paragraph around one main point, connect supporting details explicitly, and use pronouns and transitions so their references are clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “local tradition,” “pollution,” “breathtaking scenes,” “cultures and traditions,” and “boost economy.” This gives the response a basic range for discussing tourism and its effects. However, vocabulary is often repetitive or imprecise, and several word combinations make meaning less clear, such as “the best source of income of every country,” “damaged the surrounded,” and “main hand in the development.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, including “behaivours,” “vistors,” and “fatest.” Build a more precise set of phrases for economic benefits and cultural or environmental impacts, and check spelling and collocations during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, including a conditional-style example beginning “when visitor enter the country” and a contrast introduced by “On the other hand.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “I am totally disagree,” “tourist is the way,” “they went backed,” and “government should be make sure,” which show problems with verb forms, agreement, and sentence construction. Articles and plurals are also inconsistent, as in “when visitor enter.” Several sentences run together, particularly the opening, so punctuation does not clearly separate ideas. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, then use full stops to control sentence length.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.