Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-07-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the percentage of people holding full driving licences in Great Britain by age and sex.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Full car driving licence holders: by sex and age

Full car driving licence holders: by sex and age

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The charts represents the ratio of Great Britain citizens who holds the permit to drive the car and as well the age of male and female range from 17 to 70 years old and more. In early 2000's , the number of men carrying the card is noticeably high between the age group of 50 to 69 years old people and it is roughly 80 per cent. The least licence wining group of locals are 17-20 years old and it is about 39 per cent. However, in contrast to women the 80 per cent that get the permission to can run the car are belong to group of middle aged ladies in their 40's. Additionally in late 90's the graph shows the significant difference in both group of sex. In 1975 -76 women are few in counting in holding the licence particularly those that are 70 plus instead the males proportion is relevently high as compared to females.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response attempts to summarize the data but struggles to clearly identify and report the main features. While it mentions age groups and percentages, the information is often inaccurate or confusingly presented. For example, the claim that 80% of women in their 40s hold a license is not clearly supported by the provided data, and the reference to 'late 90s' is irrelevant as the graph focuses on specific age and sex demographics. The summary lacks a clear overview, and the comparisons between male and female license holders are disjointed. To improve, focus on identifying the highest and lowest points across the age spectrum and clearly contrasting the trends between the two sexes.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The response is written as a single paragraph, which hinders the logical progression of ideas. While there are some attempts at cohesive devices like 'However' and 'Additionally', their use is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as using 'instead' in a way that does not effectively contrast the previous clause. The lack of paragraphing makes the text feel like a list of observations rather than a structured report. To reach a higher band, you should organize your response into a clear introduction, an overview of the main trends, and separate paragraphs for detailed comparisons.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is quite limited and contains several non-standard collocations and word-choice errors. Phrases like 'licence wining group', 'carrying the card', and 'run the car' are unnatural and impede the professional tone required for an Academic Task 1 report. There is also a lack of precise terminology related to data description (e.g., 'ratio' is used incorrectly instead of 'percentage'). To improve, focus on learning standard academic collocations for describing graphs, such as 'proportion of', 'age bracket', and 'significant disparity'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text that occasionally cause confusion. Subject-verb agreement is inconsistent, such as 'The charts represents' and 'the 80 per cent... are belong to'. Punctuation is also problematic, with incorrect spacing around hyphens and commas. The sentence structures are mostly simple, and attempts at more complex sentences often result in errors. To improve, focus on mastering basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that your sentence structures are grammatically sound before attempting more complex forms.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.