Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the percentage of people holding full driving licences in Great Britain by age and sex.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Full car driving licence holders: by sex and age

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The shown graph illustrates total number of people holding full driving licences in Great Britain differentiated based on age and sex. The given data is calibrated in percentage.

Overall, the cummulative percentage of men's holding the licence si way more than the cummulative percentage of women's as well as in 2006 total number of citizens to hold license were greater than total number of netizens in 1975/76.

To embark with, at the age of 17-20, full car driving licence was holded by approximate 40% of men whereas womens were 20% in 1975/76. Additionally, age group 21-29 showcased that in 1975/76 near to 80% men holded full car licenese which slightly declined in 2006 whereas in womens case, it rose from just above 40% to more than 60%.Also, throught the graph for men the highest percentage of licence holder in 2006 were aged between 50-59 and in 1975/76 they were aged between 30-39 whereas for womens, in the year 2006 aged between 40-49 were highest in percent and in 1975/76 they were age between 40-49.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the chart’s subject and make a relevant overall comparison: men had higher licence-holding percentages than women, and figures generally rose between 1975/76 and 2006. You also select useful details, including the rise among women aged 21–29 and the high male figures for ages 50–59 in 2006. However, the overview is unclear when it refers to “cummulative” percentages and total numbers of citizens; the chart compares percentages by age and sex, not totals. Some reported peaks are inaccurate: women’s highest 1975/76 figure was for ages 30–39, not 40–49, while the 2006 peak was 40–49. The response also omits several important age-group comparisons, so the main features are only partly developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to specific age-group details. Sequencing phrases such as “Overall,” “To embark with,” and “Additionally” help signal stages in the discussion. However, the final paragraph combines many comparisons in one long sentence, making the information difficult to follow. The overview’s reference to cumulative percentages and total numbers also weakens the connection between the chart and the points that follow. Some linking is mechanical, and the final “Also” introduces several claims without clearly separating them. Use distinct paragraphs for the overview and key comparisons, and group details by sex or by the most notable changes to create clearer progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant chart vocabulary, including “percentage,” “age group,” “declined,” and “rose,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons you intend. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “cummulative percentage,” “netizens,” “showcased,” and “holded.” Spelling errors in “licenese” and “throught” also reduce precision. The repeated use of “percentage” and “aged between” limits flexibility, while “total number” is unsuitable for data presented as proportions. Aim for concise, standard reporting language and check spelling and word forms. More precise terms such as “proportion,” “licence holders,” and “reached a peak” would make the description clearer and more appropriate for an academic chart.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a comparison with “whereas” and a clause describing changes between years. The main meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “men's holding the licence” has an incorrect possessive construction, and “full car driving licence was holded” uses an incorrect passive verb form. In “in womens case, it rose,” the possessive and reference are not clearly formed. The long final sentence also contains several clauses joined without effective punctuation, and “in the year 2006 aged between 40-49 were highest” lacks a clear subject. Practise accurate passive forms and build shorter, complete comparison sentences with clear subjects.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.