Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

A huge number of students choose to study English independently on a self- study basis rather than attend a formal course. However, without the assistance of a teacher, students often find it difficult to manage their studies.

To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There's is an ongoing debate among students about the importance of leaning as a self-student rather than attending to education facilities. Nevertheless, sometimes the lack of supervision from tutors, might impact negatively how students managed their schedule. I strongly believe that students should have a teacher because provides guidance and supervision and support with knowledge about the topics.

On one hand, supervising teachers can provide an effective guidance at the moment of learning a new language because might help with different strategies. Teachers can provide a brokedown of topics with several ways of leaning for an easy language development. For instance, depending on the student's needs, some teachers in high schools have developed a more personal-centre approach of teaching which impact positively in the leaning process and facilities a personal work schedule for the learner.

On the hand, the importance about the experience of older tutors provided a more comprehensive overview of learning. Experienced teachers can provide a more focused support for their students as they have been forming people all throughout all their lives, so they have a wider knowledge about strategies of learning. For example, senior teachers have experienced an increasingly workload at universities because their approached has allowed them to focused in more high complex subjects to teach. As a consequence, students under this type supervision are more likely to learned in effective way.

In conclusion, an effective guidance for leaning a new language always should be considered as a proper method as their advantages outweighs their disadvantages. Moreover, experienced teachers might provide an extense knowledge of information which impacted significantly in the learners under supervision.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The ideas are relevant, focusing on the benefits of teacher guidance, such as personalized strategies and the value of experience. However, the development is somewhat repetitive, and the arguments lack depth. For instance, the second body paragraph focuses on 'experienced teachers' but does not fully contrast this with the self-study alternative in a way that deepens the argument. The conclusion is a bit brief and merely restates the position rather than synthesizing the main points. To reach a higher band, you should provide more specific, concrete examples of how self-study fails compared to formal instruction.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. You use cohesive devices such as 'On one hand,' 'On the hand,' and 'In conclusion' to signal the structure. However, there are some issues with the mechanical use of these devices. For example, 'On the hand' is missing the word 'other,' and some transitions feel slightly forced. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body, and conclusion. To improve, ensure that your cohesive devices are used accurately and that the flow between sentences is more natural rather than relying on repetitive structures.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, but there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward collocations. For example, 'leaning' is used instead of 'learning,' 'brokedown' is non-standard, and 'extense' should be 'extensive.' Phrases like 'forming people' and 'high complex subjects' are unnatural. While you attempt to use more academic vocabulary, the inaccuracies occasionally impede the flow of your argument. To improve, focus on learning the correct collocations for academic writing and proofreading for common spelling and word-form errors, such as the confusion between 'learning' and 'leaning'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect the clarity of your writing. Issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'teachers... has developed'), incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'are more likely to learned'), and missing articles or prepositions. There are also punctuation and spelling errors, such as 'There's is' and 'personal-centre.' While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for verb tense consistency and subject-verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.