Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-08-11
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The bar chart shows how likely people thought they were to become victims of crime versus how likely it actually was , for three types of crime in 2009/10 and 2010/11.
Overall, the perceived risk of being a victim was far higher than the actual likelihood for all three crimes in both years . Additionally , car crime was perceived as the greatest danger, while burglary had the highest perceived risk in 2009/10 dropped in 2010/11.
In 2009/10, around 16% of people believed they would be burglary , which fell to about 13% in 2010/11 . In contrast , the actual likelihood remained low at roughly 2-3% in both years . for car crime , the perceived risk was highest , at approximately 21% in 2009/10 and 17%in 2010/11 , whereas the actual figures were only about 4-5%. Similarly, for violent crime , around 15% perceived a risk in both years , but the actual likelihood was just 2-3%.
In conclusion , people consistently overestimated their chances of being victims of crime . The gap between perception and reality was largest for car crime
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
You have successfully identified the main features of the graph and made relevant comparisons between the perceived and actual crime rates. You provided a clear overview and supported your points with accurate data from the chart. To reach a higher band, ensure that your summary of the data is more precise. For example, when mentioning that burglary 'dropped in 2010/11', it would be more accurate to specify the figures to show the extent of the change. Additionally, ensure that all comparisons are fully developed; you correctly noted that the gap was largest for car crime, which is a good analytical observation.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You use cohesive devices such as 'In contrast', 'Similarly', and 'In conclusion' to guide the reader through the information. However, the paragraphing could be improved; the second paragraph is quite short and could be integrated into the body or expanded. Additionally, some transitions feel slightly mechanical. To improve, focus on varying your cohesive devices and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, singular focus to enhance the flow of your argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information clearly, using terms like 'perceived risk', 'actual likelihood', and 'consistently overestimated'. There are some minor issues with word choice, such as 'believed they would be burglary', which should be 'believed they would be victims of burglary'. While the vocabulary is adequate for the task, it lacks the sophistication and precision required for higher bands. Incorporating more varied synonyms for 'high' or 'low' and more precise collocations related to statistical trends would strengthen this criterion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this task. However, there are several grammatical errors, such as '17%in' (missing space), 'for car crime' (incorrect capitalization), and the aforementioned 'believed they would be burglary'. These errors do not impede communication, but they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on proofreading for small mechanical errors and ensure that your sentence structures are consistently accurate, particularly when dealing with complex comparisons.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
