Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-08-12
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type
Student answer (Band 7.0)
The bar chart demonstrates the percentages of the perception of danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of burglary, car crime and violent crime over the two periods of time from 2009 to 2011. Overall, car crimes showed the most significant rate in both perception and actual incidents in 2009 to 2019 and 2010 to 2011.
Regarding the perceived crime rate, car crimes decreased from about 21% in 2009/10 to 17% in 2010/11. Both burglary and violent crime had the same portion at approximately 15.5% in 2009/10. Similarly, both crimes dropped slightly to around 13% in 2010/11.
The car crime actual rate was at approximately to 4.5% in 2009/10, then decreased marginally at around 4% in 2010/11. On the contrary, burglary actual crime increased slightly from about 2% in 2009/10 to 2.5% in 2010/11. Moreover, the actual violent crime rate remained the same at around 3% over the 2 two periods of time.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
The response covers all parts of the task and provides a clear overview. You have successfully identified the main features and made relevant comparisons between the perceived and actual crime rates. The data is accurately reported, and the distinction between the three crime types is maintained throughout. To reach a higher band, ensure that the overview is more analytical; for instance, highlighting the significant gap between the perceived danger and the actual likelihood of crime would strengthen the response. Overall, the information is well-selected and presented in a logical manner.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The response is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the data, which helps the reader follow the analysis easily. Cohesive devices such as 'Regarding', 'Similarly', and 'On the contrary' are used effectively to link sentences and ideas. The paragraphing is appropriate for this task type. To improve, you could vary your cohesive devices slightly more to avoid repetitive structures, but the current flow is clear and coherent throughout the text.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
You have used a sufficient range of vocabulary to describe the data, including terms like 'significant rate', 'actual incidents', and 'decreased marginally'. The word choice is generally precise and appropriate for an academic report. There are no significant spelling or word-choice errors that impede communication. To achieve a higher score, try to incorporate more sophisticated collocations or less common vocabulary related to data trends, such as 'a downward trend', 'remained relatively stable', or 'a marked discrepancy'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0
The response demonstrates a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Most sentences are error-free, and your control over grammar and punctuation is solid. There are minor slips, such as 'at approximately to 4.5%' (the 'to' is unnecessary) and 'over the 2 two periods', which are minor slips rather than systematic errors. The majority of your sentences are accurate, and the meaning is always clear. To aim for a higher band, ensure consistent proofreading to eliminate these small slips and try to incorporate a wider variety of complex grammatical structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
