Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-09-16
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type
Student answer (Band 6.5)
This bar chart compares people's precieve risk of becoming a victim of three types of crime burglary, car crime and violent crime with the actual incidence of these crimes in 2009-10 and 2010-11.
Overall, the perceived likelihood of being a victim was significantly higher than the actual likelihood forall crime types in both years. While perceived risk fell slightly between the two years, the actual crime rate remained relatively stable and very low.
Car crime was perceived to be the biggest threat. In 2009-10. about 21% of individuals thought they would be a victim, compared to an actual rate of only around 4%. By 2010-11 perceived risk for car crime had dropped to about 17%, while the actual rate stayed at 4%.
For burglary, around 15% of respondents felt at risk in 2009-10, but the actual rate was only about 2%. The following year, both perceived risk13% and actual 2.5% showed a similar pattern.
Violent crime followed the same trend. About 15% of people perceived themselves to be at risk in 2009-10 versus an actual rate of 3% and this perceived fear fell to 13% in 2010-11, while the actual rate remained changed at under 3%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The student successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons across the categories and years. An appropriate overview is provided right at the beginning, noting the general disparity between perceived and actual crime risks and the relative stability over time. Key data points are accurately cited, such as car crime being perceived as the biggest threat at around 21% in 2009-10 compared to an actual rate of roughly 4%. Figures for burglary and violent crime are also properly referenced against the source chart. The response meets all requirements for Task Achievement at a high level.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, an overview paragraph, and well-structured body paragraphs dedicated to each crime type. Cohesive devices such as 'While', 'compared to', and 'The following year' are used effectively to guide the reader through the data. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different ideas. Although there is a minor omission of a linking verb in the fourth paragraph ('perceived risk13% and actual 2.5%'), the overall logical progression remains smooth and easy to follow throughout.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The student demonstrates a sufficient and generally appropriate range of vocabulary for an Academic Task 1 response, employing terms such as 'perceived likelihood', 'incidence', 'significantly higher', and 'relatively stable'. There are a few vocabulary and spelling errors, such as 'precieve' instead of 'perceive' and 'remained changed' instead of 'remained unchanged'. However, less common items are attempted with some awareness of style and collocation, and these minor inaccuracies do not impede overall communication.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses introduced by 'While' and comparative structures. There are several grammatical slips and punctuation errors, notably the spelling slip 'precieve', a missing preposition in 'forall', and a fragmented clause structure in 'while the actual rate remained changed at under 3%'. Despite these errors, the majority of sentences are clear and the grammatical control is adequate to ensure that meaning is successfully conveyed.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
