Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-09-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type

Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type

Student answer (Band 7.5)

Overall, a striking discrepancy exists across all categories: the perceived danger of crime was dramatically higher than the actual likelihood of becoming a victim. Additionally, while the perceived threat of crime saw a noticeable decline across all types over the two-year period, the actual crime rates experienced a marginal increase.Looking closely at the specifics, car crime was consistently viewed as the most significant threat. In 2009/10, the perceived danger for car crime peaked at just over 21%, before dropping to around 17.5% in 2010/11. Despite this intense public anxiety, the actual occurrence of car crime was vastly lower, hovering at just 2% in the first year and rising slightly to nearly 5% in the second year.A similar pattern is evident in the remaining categories. Public concern regarding burglary started at approximately 15% in 2009/10, falling to roughly 13% the following year. However, the real threat remained exceptionally low, shifting slightly from roughly 2% to 2.5%. Violent crime followed an identical path; public worry dropped from about 15% to 13.5%, whereas the actual rate of victimization crept up minutely from about 3% to 3.5% over the same timeframe.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource7.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy8.0
Overall7.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response fully and accurately addresses the task by providing a clear overview and effectively reporting the main features of the chart. The student successfully identifies the striking discrepancy between perceived danger and actual likelihood across all categories, as well as the overarching trends over the two-year period. Specific data points are cited correctly, such as car crime peaking at just over 21% in 2009/10 and dropping to around 17.5% in 2010/11, alongside accurate reporting for burglary and violent crime. The information is well-selected, fully supported by the visual data, and comparisons are made effectively throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

Ideas are logically sequenced and progress naturally from a strong opening overview into detailed body paragraphs. Paragraphing is used appropriately, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the visual data (an overall summary followed by car crime, and finally burglary and violent crime). Cohesive devices are managed skilfully and unobtrusively, using expressions like 'Additionally', 'Looking closely at the specifics', 'Despite this intense public anxiety', and 'A similar pattern is evident in the remaining categories' to establish clear relationships between ideas without mechanical repetition.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.5

The student demonstrates a wide, flexible, and natural lexical range appropriate for an Academic Task 1 response. Vocabulary is used with precision and stylistic awareness, incorporating sophisticated phrases such as 'striking discrepancy', 'marginal increase', 'intense public anxiety', and 'crept up minutely'. There are only occasional minor inaccuracies, such as reading 21% slightly differently or phrasing, but word choice and collocation are generally handled with a high degree of control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 8.0

A wide variety of complex sentence structures is used flexibly throughout the response. The majority of sentences are error-free, demonstrating excellent control of subordination, participial phrases ('hovering at just 2%'), and prepositional phrases. Punctuation is accurate, and grammar is handled with great precision, allowing the complex comparative relationships between perceived and actual crime data to be communicated seamlessly. Only rare minor slips might be found, but none impede communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.