Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type
Student answer (Band 6.5)
The bar graph illustrates the expected threat and real occurrence of being a victim of various criminal activities involving a burglary, a car crime, and a violent crime in 2009/10 and 2010/11.
Overall the graph shows that in both 2009/10 and 2010/11, the expentency of being a victim of a criminal activity and the actual crime rate was highest for a car crime.
In 2009/10, a perceived chance of being affected by illegal activities was highest for a car crime, representing a proportion of almost 21% while only 4-5% people were affected by such activity in reality. The hypothesized chance of occurring of harmful activities for a burglary and a violent crime was similar, having a percentage of 15. Comparing to it, the actual number was higher for a violent crime followed by a burglary.
In 2010/11, the trend of imagined and actual crime was similar to 2009/10 as also in 2010/11, criminal activities involving cars were the highest. Furthermore, the perceived proportion of happening of a burglary and a violent crime were almost 13%. On the other hand, the actual figure was higher for a violent crime as compared to a burglary.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The student covers all parts of the task well, selecting the main features and making relevant comparisons across both years and crime types. An overview is successfully included in the second paragraph, highlighting that car crime had the highest perceived and actual rates. Key data points are accurately cited, such as the 21% perceived figure for car crime in 2009/10 and the lower actual rates. However, the expression 'proportion of almost 21% while only 4-5% people were affected' contains a slight imprecision regarding percentages versus people, but overall the task is fully addressed with well-supported ideas, placing it firmly at band 7.0.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response shows a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Information is grouped logically by year in the body paragraphs, and paragraphs are used appropriately to structure the response. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well, such as 'Overall', 'In 2009/10', 'Comparing to it', and 'In 2010/11'. While some transitions like 'Comparing to it' are a bit awkward or slightly non-standard, they do not obscure the logical relationships between ideas. Referencing and progression are clear, justifying a solid band 6.5 or 7.0; here, cohesive devices function effectively enough to meet band 7.0 criteria.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student demonstrates an adequate to sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, successfully using terms such as 'perceived threat', 'actual likelihood', 'criminal activities', and 'proportion'. There are some somewhat unnatural collocations or word choices, such as 'expentency' (presumably meaning expectation), 'imagined crime', and 'proportion of happening'. Despite these occasional lexical inaccuracies, the meaning is always clear and the range allows the writer to discuss statistical data adequately, fitting the band 6.0 profile.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including relative clauses and subordinate clauses (e.g., 'representing a proportion of almost 21% while only 4-5% people were affected'). There are some grammatical errors and awkward phrasings, such as 'involving a burglary, a car crime, and a violent crime' and 'the hypothesized chance of occurring of harmful activities'. Punctuation is generally acceptable, and errors do not impede communication, allowing the response to secure a band 6.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
