Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the perceived danger and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Perceived and actual likelihood of being a victim of crime: by crime type

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The provided bar chart illustrates information about percieved and actual likelihood of being a victim in three deiiferent crime types. The figures are measured in percentages.

Overall, it can be observed that percieved victim of crime had the highest figure in all years and all types of crimes, whereas actual victim of crime recorded the lowest figure.

In terms of perceived from 2009/10, Car Crime recorded 21%, compared with actual victims in 2009/10 for Car crime was 17%. Similarly, Burglary stood at 15.5% in perceived 2009/10 , whileViolent crime was recorded for 15.75% . Furthermore,Actual 2009/10 accounted for 2% in buglary , 4% in Car crime and 2.5% in Violent crime.

On the other hand,Perceived 2010/11 accounted for 12% in Burglary,16.5% in Car crime and 17% in Violent crime which was higher than actual 2010/11. Likewise, actual 2010/11 showed lower percentages in all crime types . Overall, the figures indicate that perceived crime recorded higher percentages in entire years while actual crime victims reported lower percentages.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response attempts to address the main features of the chart, providing a general overview and citing several specific data points regarding perceived and actual crime. However, the task achievement is only partial because there are notable inaccuracies in reading the data, such as stating that actual victims of car crime in 2009/10 reached 17% and confusing the categories for 2010/11. The selection of data is somewhat disorganized, and certain comparisons lack clarity or precision. To reach a higher level, the response would need to accurately report the figures directly from the chart and provide a more fully developed, coherent summary of the main trends without misinterpreting the specific data categories.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response demonstrates some organisation with a clear introduction and conclusion, and attempts to group data by year and crime type. However, there is no clear overall progression, and the logical flow between sentences is occasionally hindered by mechanical or inaccurate use of cohesive devices, such as repetitive transitions like 'On the other hand' and 'Similarly'. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal structuring of paragraphs lacks cohesion, leading to a disjointed reading experience. To improve, the writer needs to ensure that ideas are sequenced logically with a smoother flow of information, using referencing words accurately to guide the reader through the data comparisons.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task, with repeated use of basic terms such as 'recorded', 'figures', and 'percentages'. There are noticeable spelling and word choice errors, including 'percieved' instead of 'perceived', 'deiiferent' instead of 'different', and 'buglary' instead of 'burglary'. These lexical errors and awkward phrasing sometimes cause difficulty or require the reader to slow down. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their lexical range by incorporating more precise vocabulary related to data reporting and avoid frequent spelling mistakes by carefully checking their work.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer uses a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic subject-verb constructions with frequent attempts at complex sentences that are often faulty. There are recurrent grammatical errors, including prepositions and awkward clause structures, such as 'whileViolent crime was recorded for 15.75%' and missing articles or incorrect agreements. These frequent errors persist throughout the text and can cause some difficulty for the reader. To progress, the writer should practice constructing error-free complex sentences and pay closer attention to basic grammatical rules, subject-verb agreement, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.