Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

the bar graph shows the propotion of earning in one country from 2015 and 2016. the x axis shows the product category and the y axis shows the percentage and the values of products.people earn money from different parts resources. earning play a crucial role in our life yet we did not survive in any field of life without money.moreover, people earn money 65 percent from petroleum products. this earning increase from 2015 to 2016.every product have their own value and role.engineeres develop a lot of good things in 2015 to 2016. engineers thing become popular in 2015 at 60 percent level and make a good place industry with good percentage in 2016.gems and jewellery provide 50 prcent earning moreover, agriculture products is fourth crucial category that provide 40 percent eaning from 2015 to 2016. textile play a lowest play in indutries. petrolum produtcs got a higher place on the other hand textiles is the lowest version for earn money.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The response identifies the chart as concerning export earnings and makes a few relevant comparisons, including that petroleum is the leading category and textiles are the lowest. However, it misreads the vertical axis as a percentage and gives several inaccurate figures: petroleum is about $61–63 billion, not “65 percent”; gems are about $41–43 billion, not “50 percent”; and agricultural exports are around $31 billion, not “40 percent.” It also says textiles are lowest, although their 2016 value is roughly equal to agriculture. The overview is limited, and the discussion includes unsupported claims about people earning money and engineers’ popularity rather than reporting the data. A clearer summary of the main trends and accurate comparisons would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a basic attempt to move through the product categories, and the final comparison between petroleum and textiles gives the response some direction. However, ideas are not arranged into clear paragraphs, and the progression is difficult to follow because data reporting is mixed with general statements such as “earning play a crucial role in our life.” Linking words including “moreover” and “on the other hand” are repeated or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas. Some references are also unclear, as in “this earning” and “engineers thing.” Group the response into an introduction, an overview, and focused detail paragraphs, then use simple links to show contrasts and changes accurately.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “product category,” “petroleum products,” “gems and jewellery,” and “percentage,” so the topic is recognisable. There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “crucial category” and “provide earning.” However, vocabulary is often repetitive or imprecise: “earning” is used where “export revenue” or “value” is needed, and “engineers thing” does not clearly describe engineered goods. Spelling errors such as “propotion,” “prcent,” “indutries,” and “petrolum” reduce accuracy. Use the chart’s category labels consistently and choose precise terms for values, increases, and decreases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response contains several simple sentence patterns and attempts to connect ideas with words such as “moreover” and “on the other hand.” Some meaning can be understood, but grammatical control is uneven. Errors include subject–verb agreement in “earning play” and “every product have,” missing or incorrect articles in phrases such as “in 2015 to 2016,” and inconsistent tense when describing the chart. Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also weak: several ideas run together without clear separation, while spacing around full stops is inconsistent. Practise accurate simple sentences first, especially agreement and past-tense reporting, then combine related comparisons using controlled clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.