Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

This graph showes the comparison of a countryes export in different catagories in 2015 and 2016.Starting from the first portion about petroleum products,which shows that value increases from 60.1 percewnt to 60.7 percent.Scond portion shows the increase of engineering goods from 50.9 to 60.1.Third part shows that the gems and jewellery export decreases from 50.1 to 50 percent.And fourth graph shows that export of agriculture productsa increase from 40.1 percent to 40.2. the last graph shows that export of textiles increases from 30.2 to 40.1 percent.

The whole graph shows that the countries export increase by some percentage from 2015 value to 2016. But the alarming thing is value of petrolium and aggriculture value decreasers from 2015 in 2016. So the country needed to pay attention to petrolium and aggriculture development.If country wants to make his economhy stable it mujst make policies for the benifits of petrolium and agriculture field

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies the five export categories and attempts to describe changes, but it reports several figures inaccurately and misunderstands the overall pattern. The chart values are in billions of dollars, not percentages: for example, petroleum rises from about $61 billion to $63 billion, while engineered goods rise from about $57 billion to $62 billion. Gems and jewellery fall from about $43 billion to $41 billion, not from 50.1 to 50. The overview is also contradictory: it says exports generally increased, then claims petroleum and agriculture decreased, although both rose slightly or remained broadly stable. The final policy recommendation is not required by the task. A clear overview of the main increases and the one decline, supported by accurate comparisons, would make the summary more relevant.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response follows a recognisable sequence through the categories, using phrases such as “Starting from the first portion,” “Third part,” and “the last graph.” This gives the reader some sense of order. However, the information is presented as one long paragraph, and the overview and category details are not clearly separated. The transition to “But the alarming thing” introduces a claim that conflicts with the earlier account, while the concluding policy advice moves away from summarising the visual. Some linking is repetitive and mechanical. Organise the response into a brief introduction, an overview of the main trends, and a paragraph comparing the figures; use transitions to clarify contrasts rather than simply listing each category.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses a basic range of task-related vocabulary, including “increases,” “decreases,” “export,” and category names, so the general subject is usually identifiable. However, word choice and spelling errors are frequent and sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow: “countryes,” “catagories,” “percewnt,” and “petrolium” are examples. Some expressions are imprecise for describing a chart, such as “first portion” and “fourth graph,” and “alarming thing” is an unsuitable evaluative phrase for a neutral data summary. Prefer standard terms such as “category,” “figure,” “rose,” and “fell,” and use “billion dollars” rather than “percent” when reporting the chart’s values. Proofreading spelling would also improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response communicates a sequence of observations, but grammatical control is inconsistent. The opening has a subject–verb agreement error (“This graph showes”), and several sentences omit necessary articles or use awkward sentence patterns, as in “Starting from the first portion about petroleum products, which shows…” The final section contains further errors in agreement and verb form, including “the countries export increase” and “it mujst make policies.” Most sentences rely on simple repeated structures, with limited accurate use of more complex forms. Build complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and tense consistently—for example, “The value of petroleum exports increased from about $61 billion in 2015 to $63 billion in 2016.” Punctuation and spacing also need careful proofreading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.