Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years. But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The role of women has changed much in many societies but they still can not say that they reached to gender equality. While I agree with this because in many countries women are rarely seen in high profile meetings and they are still responsible for their children's broughtup.

In many first world countries where the role of women has changed more from the past they still do not include women of the country in sensitive meetings because they think that women are not intellectual enough that is why male dominance is higher in such roles. For instance in America a fraction of women can be seen in high profile meetings regarding national security.

In every country of the world till date women is expected to look after the home, children and even spouses. Ladies go to their work, do laundry, feed the kids, bring groceries and even drive their toddlers to school but husbands do only one job and come home to prepared meals while the wife do not have the opportunity of such luxury.

In conclusion, the women's place might have been changed in many cultures but they still can not call it gender equality. Women are kept away from important matters and home is still considered her responsibilty.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you agree that changes in women’s roles have not produced equality, and both examples—women’s limited presence in security meetings and their domestic workload—are relevant. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The claim about women being excluded from “sensitive meetings” needs explanation or a more specific example, while the household example lists duties but does not explore why this unequal division persists or its effects. The conclusion restates your view rather than adding insight. The response also contains 210 words, so it does not meet the required minimum of 250; this limits the space available to develop your reasons and examples. Extend each main point with explanation and a concrete supporting detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and a conclusion returns to the central claim. This makes the main line of argument understandable. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited, and some links between ideas are abrupt. For example, the first body paragraph moves from “first world countries” to a claim about women’s intellectual ability and then to America without explaining the connection or supporting the generalisation. The second paragraph’s list of household tasks also needs a clearer link to the claim about unequal responsibility. Use topic sentences followed by explanation and evidence, and add precise transitions or referencing rather than relying mainly on “For instance” and “In conclusion.”

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “gender equality,” “male dominance,” “national security,” and “responsible.” These choices help communicate your main concerns. However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which makes parts of the argument less clear. Examples include “reached to gender equality,” “women of the country,” “broughtup,” and “the women’s place.” Spelling and word-form problems such as “responsibilty” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully; for instance, describe women as being “represented in senior decision-making” rather than “seen in high profile meetings.” This would make your ideas sound more natural and specific.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a concessive opening with “While I agree” and a relative clause beginning “where the role of women has changed.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in sentence construction and agreement occur often enough to affect clarity. For example, “While I agree with this because” leaves the opening clause incomplete, “women is expected” has incorrect subject–verb agreement, and “the wife do not have” also has an agreement error. The long sentence beginning “Ladies go to their work” joins several ideas without clear control. Practise complete clause structures, consistent subject–verb agreement, and punctuation that separates related points. Shorter, accurately controlled sentences would improve readability.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.