Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years. But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Over the past 50 years women proved their existence and involvement in major feilds of society, however scoceity never leave a chance to claim equal rights for woemn.Major population in the society still supress women who want to agitate regarding their concerns and their rights in this challening world. In my opinion I commend that women still could not find place for equal rights in this male dominating society.
Three arguments for agreement will be explained below.
Women achieved numerous career goals and brought enlighted development in the society from the past five decades. Even after achieving greater heights, scoiety still seeks women as the weakest pillar of development.
The shoutout for women rights is always a side track topic for the main stream media. Many women still fight for their recognition in the dark. A prime solution which could be offered over this is to educated every women about their rights, governments should take an active steps in establishing various camps in bringing out girls from country side and letting them to discover about their importance and rights in the society.
Education being the only possibility to bridge the gap between the societal injustice towards women. Providing an equal importamce towards women's reservation can also bring up many aspiring girl children to acheive their dreams and making them to create an impactfull society towars women.
In conclusion I would still agree that gender equality is the biggest concern in the current society and the ideology of the society although women made lot of advancements in their fields they still could not get their equal rights for their actions.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
Your position is clear: you agree that women have not yet achieved equality, and you give relevant points about social attitudes, media attention, education and representation. However, the response addresses the issue only partially because it mainly asserts that inequality persists rather than explaining what equality would involve or showing how women’s position has changed over the past 50 years. The claim that women have achieved career goals is not supported with a specific example, and the proposed education camps and reservation are mentioned briefly without explaining their likely impact. Develop two or three arguments with concrete examples and connect each directly to the question. This would make your response more complete and your reasoning more convincing.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has an identifiable structure, with an introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the reader can follow its general focus on continuing inequality. However, progression between ideas is limited: the sentence announcing “Three arguments for agreement” is not followed by three clearly separated arguments, and the discussion moves from media attention to education and reservation without fully explaining the links. Some connections are also awkward, such as “Education being the only possibility,” which does not form a complete transition into the next point. Use topic sentences to establish each paragraph’s main claim, then explain and illustrate it before moving on. More precise linking and clearer references would help the argument develop rather than read as a series of related assertions.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “gender equality,” “recognition,” “societal injustice” and “reservation,” and these choices show awareness of the subject. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate spellings or word choices make the writing less clear, for example “feilds,” “scoceity,” “supress” and “importamce.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “proved their existence” and “weakest pillar of development”; these do not express your intended ideas precisely. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. Replacing broad or unclear phrases with specific terms about employment, representation, pay or social expectations would make your argument more precise and give you greater flexibility.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “women who want to agitate regarding their concerns” and a longer sentence about government action. However, complex constructions are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. For example, “society never leave” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “governments should take an active steps” has an article and plural mismatch. “Education being the only possibility to bridge the gap” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, and punctuation is missing between the opening sentences. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement, articles and sentence boundaries. Shorter, controlled sentences will help you communicate your ideas more reliably.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.