Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic:
Many young people choose to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel. The experience of non-academic life this offers benefits the individual when they return to education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience
Student answer (Band 4.0)
In every year the many young people prefer to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel .
Many people can choose starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel . Some people can choose the work experience . Those people can work experience are good . The work experience is very important in our daily life . Those people to learn work experience . He didn't difficult in our life . These people they don't learn the work experience . He is many difficult in our daily life . He don't successful in our daily life . He did successful I. Our daily life he learn the work experience . He don't learn work experience he didn't successful in our daily life .
Second , those people prefer to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to travel . Those people can travel them other countries and can enjoy them . Those people can't successful in our daily life . This people can more difficulties in our daily life. Those people can waste the time to starting the university . There are no benefits in our daily life to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to travel .
In conclusion , those people can starting university in order to gain work experience is successful and those people starting university in order to travel didn't successful in our daily life . This people didn't important for work. This people can't Year out between finishing school and starting university .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0
The response refers to both work experience and travel, and the conclusion suggests a preference for work experience. However, it does not clearly answer whether non-academic life benefits young people when they return to education; instead, it repeatedly claims that travellers are unsuccessful and that work experience leads to success, without explaining these outcomes or linking them to university study. The ideas are therefore very limited and only minimally address the question. The response also falls 51 words short of the 250-word minimum, which leaves little room to develop reasons or provide the relevant examples requested. To improve, state a clear degree of agreement and explain how each experience could affect students’ skills, motivation, or readiness to study, using specific examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is a basic overall structure: an opening, separate sections on work experience and travel, and a conclusion. The sequence is recognisable, and “Second” signals a move to the travel point. However, progression within paragraphs is weak because the same claims are repeated—for example, “successful in our daily life” and “difficult in our daily life”—rather than developed in a logical chain. References such as “those people” and “this people” are also unclear, making it difficult to follow who is being discussed. The conclusion introduces claims about work and success without resolving the question about benefits on returning to education. Use one focused paragraph per reason, connect each explanation to the task, and use clear pronouns and linking phrases.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.0
The vocabulary is basic and repetitive, with frequent reliance on “people,” “work experience,” “successful,” and “daily life.” These words communicate a few broad ideas, but the limited range makes it hard to express distinctions between gaining practical skills, travelling, and returning to study. Some combinations are unclear or unnatural, such as “can work experience are good” and “travel them other countries”; these choices strain the reader’s understanding. There is some relevant topic vocabulary, including “university,” “work experience,” and “travel,” but it is not developed into more precise language. Build a small set of accurate phrases for the topic, such as “develop practical skills,” “gain independence,” and “adjust to academic study,” and check how verbs combine with nouns.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
The response mainly uses short, simple statements, with little variety in sentence structure. Frequent problems with verb forms and agreement make several sentences difficult to interpret: “Those people can work experience are good,” “He don't successful,” and “those people can starting university” are examples. Pronoun use also shifts between “those people,” “he,” and “they,” while sentence boundaries and spacing around punctuation are inconsistent. A few basic clauses are understandable, such as “The work experience is very important in our daily life,” but control is not consistent enough to communicate the argument clearly. Practise accurate subject–verb patterns and simple cause-and-effect sentences before attempting longer structures; for example, “Work experience can help students develop skills that are useful at university.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.