Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-25
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic:
Many young people choose to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel. The experience of non-academic life this offers benefits the individual when they return to education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience
Student answer (Band 6.0)
A lot of students prefer to take a year's break after completing their higher secondary education from schools, before starting a new journey of learning in universities. This break helps them to gain experience of non-academic life skills which will further benefit them , when they return to education. I partly agree with this idea and both postive as well as negative impact of this 1 year break will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
Nowdays, students take a gap after finishing with their schools and that gap contibutes significanlty in their non-academic learnings. They explores the new places and activities which encourage them to meets new people and learn something new. For instance, a student who come out of his box and goes to some spot and explore different things is more likely to have increment in their knowledege. Furthermore, students a chance to decide effectively about their future goals and analyse the subjects they need to pursue in order to fulfill their dreams.
However, too long break can affect their studies negatively as they may face problems such as lack of concentration and loss of confidence. For instance, a learner may find it difficult to study with full focus after a long break and they may develop a inferiority complex where he will fear being left alone.
To conclude, I partly agree with the given statement as even having a year break will significantly contribute to students non-academic life skills, it might have some negative conseqences like they will lose study concentration after a long time. Conseqently, I think if students are taking a long break, they should be in touch with their studies.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you partly agree, and you address both the benefits of a gap year and the risk of losing study focus. The discussion of exploring new places, meeting people and considering future goals is relevant to the prompt. However, these benefits are mostly asserted rather than explained in detail; for example, the claim that travel increases a student’s knowledge would be stronger with a specific example of a skill or insight gained and how it helps at university. The negative point about concentration is also brief, and the reference to an “inferiority complex” is not clearly connected to the effects of a break. Develop each main reason more fully and show more directly how non-academic experience benefits students when they return to education.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, separate body paragraphs present benefits and drawbacks, and the conclusion restates your view. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “However” and “To conclude” help readers follow the main progression. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some flexibility in connecting ideas. At times, though, the links are mechanical, and the relationship between points is not always clear. The example about a student who “comes out of his box” does not clearly illustrate the preceding claim, while the shift from loss of concentration to an “inferiority complex” needs explanation. Use more precise referencing and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “gap,” “non-academic,” “future goals,” “concentration” and “confidence,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “inferiority complex,” although this phrase is not clearly suited to the point being made. Overall, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “Nowdays,” “contibutes,” “significanlty,” “knowledege” and “conseqences.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “increment in their knowledge” and “non-academic learnings.” Build a more accurate range of collocations and check spelling carefully; this will make your meaning clearer and more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “even having a year break will significantly contribute …, it might have some negative consequences.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some errors in agreement, articles and sentence construction remain. For example, “They explores” should use a plural verb, and “a student who come” needs a singular verb. In “they may develop a inferiority complex where he will fear,” the article and pronoun reference are inconsistent. The opening sentence also contains an awkwardly placed comma before “when.” Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles and consistent pronouns, and revise long sentences to ensure their clauses are joined clearly.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.