Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the average number of hours that women in various age groups and women with varying levels of education spend on primary activities each week.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average hours per week women spent in selected primary activities, by age and educational attainment, 2009

Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 12.16.16 PM.png

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graphical representation delineates the amount of time weekly alloted to a number of daily routined activities by females in 2009 with respect to their age group and academic level. The calibration is in number of hours.

Overall, it is striking that irrespective of their educational background or ages, time spent on recreational activities dominated the poll almost everytime. There were however, certain leaps and bounds observed in the remaining tasks such as employment related work or household chores.

To incept with, during teenage, the subjects spent most significant time for leisure sports which were 36.8 hours, followed by household and corporate tasks with almost 6 hours individually. Gradually, with the surveyees aged to adulthood, in their 40s, the time they allocated to their recreation routine showcased a decline with an average of about 30 hours weekly. Whereas, their commitment towards formal tasks rose significantly with around 20 hours per week as a whole. The elderly women nevertheless, again started to engage in sports more with approximately 50 hours in every 7 days with a decline in dedication to another forms of work.

On the contrary, women who just pursued intermediate or complete schooling spent around 40 hours in leisure and sports per week. However, collegians with any form of degree balanced their work life with sports with nearly 25 hours allotted to work related activities.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The candidate has attempted to cover the main features of the chart regarding age groups and educational attainment, but the execution falls short of a higher band due to inaccurate data reporting and misinterpretation of the categories. For instance, stating that elderly women engaged in sports for approximately '50 hours in every 7 days' is incorrect and misreads the provided axes or categories. Furthermore, the descriptions of age groups and schooling levels lack precise referencing to the specific data points in the chart. While an overview is provided, the data selection is somewhat disorganised and fails to give a fully clear and accurate summary of the information. Consequently, this performance aligns with Band 5.5, as it addresses the task and attempts to report features, but contains significant inaccuracies and under-developed comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response is arranged into four paragraphs, providing a logical structure with an introduction, an overview, and separate body paragraphs for age and education. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Overall,' 'To incept with,' 'Gradually,' and 'On the contrary,' though some transitions like 'To incept with' are unnatural or awkward in an academic context. Paragraphing is utilised appropriately to separate different variables of the prompt. However, referencing is at times confusing, and the progression within paragraphs feels slightly disjointed due to the imprecise data discussion. Overall arrangement is coherent enough to follow the general argument, earning a solid Band 6.0 for this criterion.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The writer attempts a wide range of vocabulary, including terms like 'delineates,' 'attainment,' 'educational background,' and 'commitment.' However, there are noticeable word choice and collocation errors throughout the response, such as 'routined activities,' 'alloted' (spelled with a single l), 'everytime' (written as one word), 'To incept with' (non-standard phrase for 'To begin with'), and 'surveyees aged to adulthood.' These lexical slips and awkward phrasings limit precision and cause occasional pauses for the reader, placing the response firmly at Band 5.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some ambition with structures like 'women who just pursued intermediate or complete schooling spent...' However, grammatical errors and awkward phrasing recur frequently. Examples include 'The calibration is in number of hours,' 'the subjects spent most significant time for leisure sports which were 36.8 hours,' and 'dedication to another forms of work' (another instead of other). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but frequent minor grammatical inaccuracies in prepositions, verb forms, and pluralisation prevent the writing from achieving a higher band. The grammar supports clear communication despite the errors, justifying a Band 6.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.