Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the average number of hours that women in various age groups and women with varying levels of education spend on primary activities each week.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average hours per week women spent in selected primary activities, by age and educational attainment, 2009

Student answer (Band 6.0)

This bar graph illustrate that average hours per week women spent in selected primary activities, by age and educational attainment, 2009

overall, it i9s clear tat the older women spend more time in leisure and sport than younger women. In addition, the time devoted to household activities are generally increase with age. while women with higher educational qualifications tended to spend more time on work-related activities.

Among women aged 15 to 19, approximately 6.9 hours per week were spent on work-related activities, compared with 36.8 hours on leisure and sports. Work-related hours increased among women aged 25 to 54, before falling considerably in the older age groups. By contrast, leisure time reached its highest level among women aged 75 and over. Time spent on household activities also generally increased with age.Template:

Regarding educational attainment, women with less than a high school diploma spent approximately 43.1hours per week on leisure and sports, while the figure for those with a bachelor's degree or higher was 28.6 hours. Work-related activities accounted for more time among women with higher qualifications. Meanwhile, the number of hours devoted to household activities was slightly lower among women with a bachelor's degree or higher than among those with less education.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response gives a clear overview of the main patterns: leisure time is highest among older women, household activity generally rises with age, and work-related hours tend to be greater among more highly educated women. It supports these points with relevant figures, including 6.9 hours of work for 15–19-year-olds and the leisure comparison of 43.1 versus 28.6 hours by education. The age-group account also notes the rise and later fall in work hours. This covers both dimensions of the chart and selects meaningful comparisons. To make the account more fully precise, qualify the household trend: it rises to 21.1 hours at ages 65–74, then falls slightly to 19.6 among those 75 and over. The overview could also mention that leisure is the largest activity for most groups.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally coherent structure, moving from an overview to age comparisons and then educational attainment. Paragraphing helps distinguish the two chart dimensions, and transitions such as “By contrast” and “Regarding educational attainment” make the relationships between points clear. However, cohesion is sometimes weakened by mechanical or incomplete transitions: “Time spent on household activities also generally increased with age.Template:” runs directly into the next section, and “overall” begins without appropriate capitalization or a clear sentence boundary. The progression within the age paragraph could also be smoother by linking the household trend to the specific age figures. Remove the stray “Template:” and use consistent paragraph breaks and punctuation to make the organisation more controlled.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range of chart-related vocabulary, including “devoted to,” “work-related activities,” “educational qualifications,” and “accounted for.” These choices communicate the main comparisons, and the response avoids excessive repetition in some places. However, several expressions are imprecise or awkward, such as “the time devoted to household activities are generally increase” and “the number of hours devoted to household activities was slightly lower.” The latter is understandable but could be expressed more directly as a comparison of weekly hours. There are also spelling and typing slips, including “i9s” and “tat,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for consistent, natural collocations such as “hours spent on” and “rose steadily,” and proofread carefully for typographical errors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mix of simple and more complex structures, including the contrast in “while women with higher educational qualifications tended to spend more time on work-related activities” and the comparison beginning “Regarding educational attainment.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some errors in sentence formation and agreement are noticeable. For example, “This bar graph illustrate” needs a singular verb, while “the time devoted to household activities are generally increase” combines incorrect agreement with an unsuitable verb form. The opening overview also has faulty sentence boundaries and capitalization (“overall” after the first line), and “36.8hours” needs a space. These errors do not prevent the reader from following the comparisons, but they limit grammatical control. Check subject–verb agreement, use either “generally increases” or “generally increased,” and punctuate complete sentences consistently.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.