Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some societies, obesity is regarded as a major problem. Some people believe that junk food advertising is largely to blame for this problem and should be banned. However, others feel that junk food advertising does not contribute to the problem of obesity and should not be banned.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience·and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In few civilizations, obesity is considered as a significant issue. Some people consider that fast food promotion is massively accused for this problem and should be forbidden. However, other believe that crap food marketing does not contribute to the issue of obesity and should not be prohibited.

Firstly, In some socities, obesity is acclaimed as a major issue . Few persons believe that the promotion for junk food is the reason to many diseases and it should be banned . They consider that the health issues like obesity are caused by the junk food . Every person has its own view about eating . Few like to eat healty food to maintain their health but others like to eat fast food . People that consume healthy meal blame the fast food advertising for the health issues in human beings . They believe that advertising of fast food on online platforms is cause for the obesity in nation. Ads on social platforms made people to eat fast food and they became unhealthy.

On the other hand, few people consider that the promotion for fast food does not contribute in the problem of obesity. they believe that promotion on social platforms for junk food is only for bussiness purposes and does not participate in the problem of obesity . Its choices of every person that what he like to eat .

In my opinion , everyone has the right to eat whatever he likes to eat .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You introduce both positions and give a personal view, but the response addresses the task only partially because the arguments are brief and largely asserted rather than explained or supported. For example, you say that social-media advertisements make people eat fast food and become unhealthy, but do not show how advertising influences choices or provide a concrete example. The opposing view is reduced to the claim that advertising is “only for bussiness purposes,” without explaining why personal choice outweighs its influence. Your opinion—that everyone may eat what they like—is clear but does not resolve whether advertising should be banned. The response is also five words below the required minimum. Develop both sides with reasons and examples, then state a more direct conclusion about the proposed ban.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting restrictions, a paragraph presenting the opposing view, and a personal conclusion. “Firstly” and “On the other hand” help signal the shift between views. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several ideas repeat rather than build on one another—for instance, the first body paragraph repeatedly links junk food promotion with obesity and health problems without adding distinct supporting points. The second view is very short, so the discussion feels unbalanced, and the final opinion is not clearly connected to the arguments. Some transitions and sentence boundaries are also awkward. Organise each body paragraph around one main reason, explain it, and use clear references to connect each supporting sentence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general subject, including “obesity,” “promotion,” “health issues,” and “social platforms.” However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate, informal, or repetitive, which can make the reader pause. “Crap food” is unsuitable for an academic essay, while “massively accused for” does not express the intended idea naturally. “Acclaimed as a major issue” is also an imprecise choice, and “promotion” is repeated where more specific terms could clarify the discussion. Spelling errors such as “socities,” “healty,” and “bussiness” further weaken control. Build a more precise academic vocabulary for advertising, consumer choice, and public health, and check spelling and collocations during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You communicate mainly through simple sentences and make some attempts to connect ideas with clauses, as in “They believe that advertising of fast food on online platforms is cause for the obesity in nation.” However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and frequent errors in articles, agreement, and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning less clear. Examples include “In few civilizations,” “other believe,” “Every person has its own view,” and “Its choices of every person that what he like to eat.” Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, including lowercase “they” after a full stop and spaces before several periods. Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then add subordinate clauses while checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.