Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some societies, obesity is regarded as a major problem. Some people believe that junk food advertising is largely to blame for this problem and should be banned. However, others feel that junk food advertising does not contribute to the problem of obesity and should not be banned.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience·and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent days, people often argued that the main reason for obesity is junk food. While other argue the claim by saying that junk food is not the only reason for obesity and should not be banned. As for that, both the views will discuss in further paragraph with relevant examples.

It is true that junk food advertisement is one of the major reason for increase in obessity, as junk food like burger and cold drink serve as a major disaster in individual health. High calories food like pizza does not only put a adverse effect on our health, but it also serve as a major problem for heart related disease. Moreover, eating junk food on regular basis can put a serious effect on people wealth, as it is really expensive to eat ouside food on daily basis.

On the other side of the coin, people counterclaim the point by saying that advertising is not single handlely responsible for the problem of obesity and should not be banned. The other several reason behind increase in obesity is irregularities among the individuals and lack of physical activity. For example: when any person is into any kind of physical or sports activity, then it will directly help them to burn their calories. Additionally, the increase of eating habits of junk food by young adults will put a severe effect on their mental health in long term.

In conclusion, junk food advertising is one of the reason for increase in junk food consumptions, but major steps like limited eating of junk food can help to save our health and money.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt partially by discussing both views on junk food advertising and obesity, and includes a concluding opinion. However, the ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the discussion on how advertisements directly cause obesity lacks robust supporting evidence and real-world examples. Similarly, the counterargument mentions physical activity and lifestyle factors, but this is presented in a very simplistic manner without adequate elaboration. While a clear position is attempted, the overall development is superficial, meaning the response sits at this level where ideas are introduced but not fully explored or extended across the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some organization with a recognizable introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is attempted, and transitional phrases such as 'Moreover' and 'On the other side of the coin' are utilized to signal shifts in thought. Nevertheless, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and cohesive devices are often mechanical or misused, as seen in the awkward transition 'As for that, both the views will discuss'. Furthermore, referencing is occasionally unclear, and repetitive sentence structures and cohesive patterns impede a smooth, logical flow from one point to the next, reflecting the characteristics of this level.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey the basic message about junk food and health. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'adverse effect' and 'consumption', but these attempts are accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, form, and spelling, such as 'obessity', 'ouside', 'single handlely', and 'high calories food'. These lexical errors and awkward collocations cause some difficulty for the reader and demonstrate a lack of precision, capping the lexical score at this level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic patterns with frequent errors when attempting more complex forms. There are recurring issues with subject-verb agreement and plurals, such as 'people often argued' instead of 'people often argue', 'the other several reason' instead of 'several other reasons', and 'heart related disease' instead of 'heart-related diseases'. Additionally, problems with verb tenses and prepositional usage appear throughout the text, and these frequent errors cause noticeable difficulty for the reader in understanding the precise meaning.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.