Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some societies, obesity is regarded as a major problem. Some people believe that junk food advertising is largely to blame for this problem and should be banned. However, others feel that junk food advertising does not contribute to the problem of obesity and should not be banned.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience·and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In several colonies, fatness is regarded as a central hurdle. Some individuals believe that fast food advertisements are largely to blame for this problem and should be boycott. However, others feel that symptoms of obesity are not due to advertising and could be arise. I agree with obesity's optimistic view. A major contibuting factor is that junk food is cause of serious health issues. It is also very detrimental for human growth. The issue of obesity has become a subject of considerable debate in recent years. While some believe that eating fast food is a negative approach, due to the fact that it brings numerous diseases, others argue that it isn't. They think that advertisement of fast food is just for hype and to get individuals reviews. I resiliently believe that it should be banned. Nature provides us a lot of things such as fresh vegetables and herbs. The major point is that we attract ourselves to fresh things. Be fresh, be active. To avoid fast food hte eay is to make your life better with healthy and fresh things. As a result, many citizens find this approach more beneficial than alternative. Additionally, the supporters of opposite view-point belive that make advertisement adds are just casual in recent times. In order to procure wealth they has been doing advertisements for several years. Their desire is to take fast food on top. They think it should not be banned. In conculsion, many individuals regarded obestiy as a major problem. They find themselves in different trials after gaining fat and their opinion is to bann the advertisements of junk food. In contrast, other want to make more advertising adds of fast food. They think it does not play a vital role in obesity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response addresses the prompt minimally, attempting to discuss both views on junk food advertising and obesity, though the position remains unclear and confused throughout. Several ideas are limited and under-developed, with repetitive statements rather than extended arguments. For instance, phrases like "fatness is regarded as a central hurdle" and "fast food advertisements... should be boycott" attempt to touch upon the task requirements, but the arguments become tangential or contradictory, such as claiming "symptoms of obesity are not due to advertising and could be arise." While the length requirement is met, the ideas lack the necessary depth and clear progression to fully satisfy the prompt's demands, meaning the response sits firmly at the lower end of task fulfillment.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

The information and ideas are not arranged coherently, leading to a lack of clear overall progression. Although the writer attempts to use paragraphing, the boundaries are confusing, and sentences frequently jump between disparate thoughts without logical transitions. Cohesive devices are either missing, inadequate, or inaccurate, creating a disjointed reading experience. For example, expressions like "The major point is that we attract ourselves to fresh things. Be fresh, be active. To avoid fast food hte eay is to make your life better" demonstrate abrupt shifts in focus and poor referencing. The overall organization fails to guide the reader smoothly through a structured debate, placing this aspect of the writing within the lower development bands.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, featuring noticeable word choice, word form, and spelling errors that frequently strain the reader. The writer relies heavily on simple terms and attempts less common vocabulary with severe inaccuracy, such as using "colonies" instead of societies, "boycott" instead of banned, and "obestiy" as a misspelling. Collocations are often awkward or unnatural, as seen in phrases like "get individuals reviews" and "procure wealth they has been doing advertisements." While the range of vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey a rudimentary topic, the frequency of lexical errors limits precision and stylistic appropriateness, characteristic of this specific band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The text displays a very limited range of structures, with attempts at complex sentences often resulting in faulty syntax. There are frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions that can cause difficulty for the reader. Examples include "could be arise," "junk food is cause of serious health issues," and "they has been doing advertisements." Punctuation and sentence boundaries are also inconsistently handled, leading to run-on thoughts or fragmented structures. While a mix of simple clauses is attempted, the persistence of basic grammatical inaccuracies prevents the writing from achieving a more secure control over sentence patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.