Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 5.0)

THE PIE CHARTS ILLUSTRATE THE PERCENTAGE BREAKDOWN OF EU EXPORTS IN INDIA AND CHINA DURING [redacted phone].

OVERALL, IT IS CLEAR THAT GERMANY ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST SHARE OF TOTAL TOPIC, WHILE AUSTRIA REPRESENTED THE LEAST POPULAR OPTION. FURTHERMORE, BELGIUM AND ITALY COMPRISED THE MAJORITY OF THE REMAINING DATA.

GERMANY WAS THE MOST DOMINANT FEATURE , MAKING UP EXACTLY 128% OF THE TOTAL. THIS WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THE SHARE OF BELGIUM, WHICH STOOD AT 55%.

IN CONTRAST , THE REMAINING QUARTERS OF THE CHART WERE DIVIDED AMONG FINLAND AND AUSTRIA. FINLAND CONSTITUTED A MERE 12 % WHILE AUSTRIA REGISTERED THE LOWEST FIGURE AT JUST 7 %.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which significantly impacts the task achievement. Furthermore, the content is factually inaccurate; the student claims Germany accounted for 128% of the total, which is mathematically impossible for a percentage breakdown. The response also fails to address the temporal aspect of the task, as it does not compare the data between 2000 and 2011, but rather treats the data as a single set. The overview is too simplistic and does not highlight the key trends or changes over the decade as required by the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into short paragraphs, which provides a basic structure. However, the progression of ideas is limited due to the brevity of the text. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Furthermore' and 'In contrast', but they feel somewhat mechanical given the lack of depth in the analysis. The referencing is clear, but the overall logical flow is hindered by the failure to synthesize the data effectively across the two time periods provided in the charts.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The range of vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive. Phrases like 'most dominant feature' and 'lowest figure' are functional but basic. There are issues with word choice, such as referring to countries as 'options' in the context of export data, which is inappropriate. The vocabulary used does not demonstrate the flexibility or precision required for a higher band score, and the errors in data interpretation (e.g., 128%) suggest a lack of control over the subject-specific terminology needed for this task.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response uses a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures. While there are some error-free sentences, the grammatical control is inconsistent. There are issues with punctuation, such as the unnecessary space before commas in 'CONTRAST ,'. Additionally, the use of '128%' indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the data, which, while primarily a task achievement issue, reflects poorly on the overall clarity of the writing. The range of structures is insufficient to demonstrate higher-level grammatical proficiency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.