Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-23
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The pie chart shoes the exports from many EU countries to India and China in the year 2000 and 2011. The chart shows many countries where in the major share of exports in India is held by the UK which is about 29% in 2000 and for China the major share in the same year is for Germany which is 38%.
Blegium had been the second highest in the year 2000 but decreased by 5% in 2011 for India. In 2011 the UK decreased. Germany aloong with other countries increased their trades with india too. Talking about China there is no significant change other than Germany which has increased by 10%. other counties trades have amost been decreased or increased by 1% to 2% respectively.
Overall we can say that many Europian countries have started trade with India and China and the market is dynamic and not stagnant in nature.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response attempts to address the prompt by reporting on the export shares of EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011. However, the selection of data is somewhat limited and lacks a thorough comparison across the four charts. For instance, the student highlights the UK for India and Germany for China, but misses out on several key trends or significant shifts in other countries. The overview provided at the end is very brief and generic. According to the Band 5 descriptors, the response addresses the task only partially and the ideas are somewhat limited. To reach a higher band, a wider range of key features should be systematically selected, grouped, and compared in a more detailed overview.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into three short paragraphs, which provides a basic structure. However, logical progression is hampered by abrupt transitions and a lack of cohesive devices. For example, moving from the first paragraph to the second feels disjointed, with phrases like 'Blegium had been...' and 'Talking about China...' acting as very informal and mechanical links rather than sophisticated cohesive devices. Paragraphing is not used to its full potential to group distinct ideas, such as separating the analysis of India from that of China. Overall, the arrangement shows some organisation, but cohesion is frequently faulty, fitting the Band 5 descriptor.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is relatively basic and repetitive, with frequent reliance on simple terms like 'shows', 'countries', 'increased', and 'decreased'. There are also clear spelling and vocabulary errors, such as 'shoes' instead of 'shows' and the misspelling 'Blegium'. While the student attempts some numerical and comparative language, the range is limited and minimally adequate for the task. Uncommon lexical items are largely absent. These limitations align closely with the Band 5 descriptor, where vocabulary is restricted and noticeable errors cause occasional difficulty for the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is weak. There are several grammatical inaccuracies and missing punctuation marks, such as in the sentence 'Germany aloong with other countries increased their trades with india too', which contains spelling errors and awkward phrasing. Additionally, tense consistency is occasionally problematic when shifting between past years and present observations. Error frequency is notable throughout the text, meaning it does not consistently achieve error-free complex sentences. This places the response firmly at Band 5.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
