Band 8.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 8.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 8.0)

The pie charts compare the percentage share of goods exported from various European Union member states to India in two different years, 2000 and 2011.

Overall, the export market underwent a notable redistribution of shares. While the United Kingdom and Belgium saw their dominance decline over the eleven-year period, Germany experienced a substantial surge to become the leading exporter of goods to India by 2011.

In 2000, the United Kingdom was the largest EU exporter to India, commanding a 29% share of the market. However, by 2011, its contribution dropped drastically by more than half to just 13%. Similarly, Belgium’s share, which stood as the second highest at 25% in 2000, experienced a moderate contraction to 20% by 2011.

Conversely, Germany witnessed significant growth during this period. Its share of exports climbed from 15% in 2000 to a dominant 25% in 2011, making it India's primary EU trading partner. Minor upward shifts were also recorded for France and Italy, which grew marginally to 9% each by 2011. Meanwhile, export figures for the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Finland remained largely stagnant, changing by no more than one percentage point. Finally, the collective share of unnamed "Other" nations nearly doubled, rising from 5% to 9%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 8.0

The student successfully addresses all parts of the prompt, providing a clear and comprehensive summary of the provided data. An effective overview is included in the second paragraph, highlighting the major shifts such as Germany's rise and the decline of the UK and Belgium. Key data points, including the specific figures for the United Kingdom (dropping from 29% to 13%) and Germany (rising from 15% to 25%), are accurately selected and reported. Comparisons between the two years are well-integrated and clearly linked to the visual data. The response meets all the requirements of an effective Academic Task 1 summary, demonstrating a well-developed and focused approach to the data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 8.0

Information and ideas are logically sequenced throughout the response, creating a smooth and natural progression. The structure follows a logical path from a clear introductory statement and overall trend to specific supporting details in subsequent paragraphs. Paragraphing is used effectively and appropriately, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the visual data. Cohesive devices, such as 'Conversely,' 'However,' and 'Meanwhile,' are used fluently and appropriately to signal relationships between ideas without feeling mechanical. Referencing and substitution are handled skillfully, ensuring that the reader can easily follow the comparison of data across the two years.

Lexical Resource: Band 8.0

The student demonstrates a wide, fluent, and flexible lexical range suitable for an academic report. Less common vocabulary items and phrases such as 'redistribution of shares,' 'moderate contraction,' and 'largely stagnant' are used skillfully and with a strong awareness of collocation and academic style. Word choice is precise, as seen in expressions like 'substantial surge' and 'minor upward shifts.' There are virtually no lexical errors, and the vocabulary choices enhance the precision and sophistication of the report, aligning well with the higher-band descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 8.0

The response features a wide range of complex structures used accurately and flexibly. The majority of sentences are completely error-free, showcasing excellent control over subordination, relative clauses, and participial phrases (e.g., 'commanding a 29% share of the market' and 'rising from 5% to 9%'). Punctuation is handled correctly throughout, and grammatical structures are varied to maintain reader engagement and academic tone. Only very occasional, non-systematic slips could be argued, placing this response firmly in the higher band for grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.