Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrate the proportioins of goods exported from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Overall,Germany increased its shares of exports to both destinations, although their shares varied over the period. Germany's contribution to exports to China increased considerably, while the United Kingdom's share of exports to India declined substiantially. In contrast, the distribution of exports to India became more balanced by 2011.In 2000, the United Kingdom was the largest exporter to India, accounting for 28% of total exports, followed by Belgium at 23%.Germany contributed 15%, while France and Italy accounted for 8% and 7%, respectively. By 2011,Germany's share had risen to 25%, making it one of the leading exporters. Belgium accounted for 20%, whereas the United Kingdom's proportion fell to 13%.

Regarding China, Germany was the largest exporter in both years. Its share increased significantly from 30% in 2000 to 48% in 2011. In contrast, Belgium's contribution declined from 8% to 5%, while France's figure decreased from 13% to 10%. The United Kingdom's share rose slightly from 5% to 7% over the same period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You provide a relevant overview, identifying Germany’s growth in both markets and the UK’s substantial decline in India, and you compare several major exporters. However, some figures are inaccurate: the UK’s share of Indian exports in 2000 was 29%, not 28%, and Belgium’s was 25%, not 23%. For China, Germany rose from 38% to 48%, rather than 30% to 48%; Belgium remained at 5%, rather than falling from 8%, and the UK fell from 9% to 7%, rather than rising from 5%. The claim that India’s distribution became more balanced is plausible but would benefit from clearer supporting comparisons. More accurate reporting across both charts would make the summary more complete and reliable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate discussion of India and China. This makes the main comparisons easy to follow, and transitions such as “In contrast” and “Regarding China” help signal shifts. However, the overview and body are not consistently separated or punctuated: the overview runs directly into “In 2000,” and several sentences are joined without spaces after full stops, such as “23%.Germany” and “2011,Germany’s.” The India section also gives a sequence of figures without a clear grouping of the smaller shares, while the China paragraph focuses on only a few countries. Use distinct paragraphs and organise details around the most important changes to make progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a suitable range of task vocabulary, including “accounting for,” “contribution,” “proportion,” “declined substantially,” and “increased significantly.” These choices help describe shares and trends, and the meaning remains clear. There are, however, several spelling slips, including “proportioins” and “substiantially,” and some phrasing is less precise: “Germany increased its shares” is awkward because the country’s share increased, while “one of the leading exporters” is vague when the figures show Germany had the largest share in India in 2011. At this level, the vocabulary is adequate and includes some less common items, but more accurate spelling and precise collocations would show greater control and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including the contrast clause “although their shares varied over the period” and the comparison “while the United Kingdom’s proportion fell to 13%.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical and punctuation errors remain. The opening should be “The pie charts illustrate,” with plural agreement, and “Germany increased its shares” should be recast as “Germany’s share increased.” Full stops are sometimes followed immediately by the next sentence, and commas are missing after introductory phrases, as in “Overall,Germany” and “By 2011,Germany’s.” These errors do not generally obstruct understanding, but careful proofreading and more consistent control of agreement and sentence boundaries would strengthen accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.