Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie charts compare the percentage of goods export from EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

In 2000, the United Kingdom listed the highest ratio of EU exports to India at 29%, followed by belgium at 25%. France and Italy contributed 8% and 7%. In 2011 Germany became the highest exporter to India by 25%, goingforward United Kingdom ratio fell down by 13% and Belgium also decrease at 20%.

In China, Germany was leading the export market in 2000 by 38%.France noted the second highest with 13%, additionally UK and Italy has the same 9% Exports. By 2011 Germany had increased the exports ratio by 48%, furthermore France declined from 13% to 10%. Uk's and Italy share had also fell down slightly to 7% and 8%.

Overall, Germany was the largest exporter to China while United Kingdom was for India. By 2011, Germany had Increased their exports to both countries and highest for china.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the main leaders in both markets and report several relevant changes, including Germany’s rise in China from 38% to 48% and the UK’s fall in India from 29% to 13%. However, the summary is only partial: it omits several useful comparisons, such as Belgium’s decline in India and the changes among smaller exporters, and the overview does not clearly summarise the contrasting patterns across both destinations. The statement that Germany increased exports to both countries is supported, but the final phrase about being “highest for china” is unclear. The response is also 148 words, below the required 150-word minimum. Develop the overview and select a few more key comparisons to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate discussion of India and China, and a concluding overview. This helps the reader follow the two destinations. However, progression within the paragraphs is sometimes abrupt, and linking words are used mechanically or inaccurately. For example, “additionally” and “furthermore” do not always clarify the relationship between the figures, while “goingforward” makes the transition difficult to read. The overview comes last but largely repeats earlier points rather than drawing the comparisons together. Use clearer sequencing, group figures by meaningful changes, and ensure each connector expresses the intended relationship. More consistent punctuation between sentences would also improve the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “percentage,” “highest exporter,” “contributed,” and “declined,” so the main information is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are unnatural, such as “listed the highest ratio,” “export market,” and “exports ratio.” Repeated use of “highest” and “increased” also makes the description less precise. There are spelling and form issues, including inconsistent capitalisation of “Belgium,” “UK,” and “China,” as well as “goingforward” written as one word. Choose standard expressions for describing shares and changes, and check spelling and capitalisation carefully to make the report more natural and accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, and the reader can usually understand the comparisons. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences awkward or unclear. Examples include “Belgium also decrease at 20%,” where the verb form and preposition are incorrect, and “UK and Italy has the same 9% Exports,” where subject–verb agreement and sentence construction need attention. “Germany had Increased their exports” also has inconsistent capitalisation and agreement. Punctuation is sometimes missing after figures, as in “38%.France.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting, agreement with plural subjects, and sentence boundaries before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.