Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-16
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The pie chart illustrates the goods exports from India and China to Europe in 2000 and 2011.
Overall, the given information is about the things came from the India and China in 11 years in all over the Europe. Both countries was the best source of income is Germany and the worst country is Austria.
In 2000, the India exports the goods to United Kingdom 29 percent and the China exports the objects to Germany 38 percent. The lowest ratio is in Austria for both was approximately 1 percent in India and 2 percent in China.
In 2011, the India major exports in Germany despite the UK. is roughly 25 percent and in UK fell to 13 percent as compare to China the larger exports in Germnay as well in India was rose to 48 percent. The Austria is still remained for both countries was 2 percent.
After the comparision, Germany was lucky for both and the UK was good for India in 2000, Austria was lowest ratio from both.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
The response identifies a few relevant headline figures, including the UK’s 29% share of exports to India in 2000 and Germany’s 38% share to China, and notes Germany’s rise to 48% for China in 2011. However, the overview is unclear and includes a major misreading: the charts show EU exports to India and China, not goods exported from those countries to Europe. The claim that Germany was the leading source for both destinations in 2000 is also inaccurate, since the UK led for India. The response gives little systematic comparison across the four charts and omits important shifts, such as Germany’s increase for India and the UK’s decline. Select the main trends accurately and organise the overview around them.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
There is some basic organisation: the response has an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs referring to 2000 and 2011. This gives the reader a rough sense of how the information is arranged. However, progression is not consistently clear, and the final paragraph repeats earlier points rather than drawing the comparisons together. Linking phrases such as “After the comparision” do not clearly show how the figures relate, while “as compare to China” makes the comparison difficult to follow. Use a clear overview followed by paragraphs comparing India and China across each year, and connect each figure explicitly to its destination and date.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The response uses some relevant chart vocabulary, including “exports,” “percent,” “lowest ratio,” and “fell,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing trade data. “Things came from” and “objects” are vague, while “Germany was lucky” does not express a meaningful trend. There are also spelling errors such as “Germnay” and “comparision,” and repeated use of “exports” without precise alternatives. Build a small set of accurate terms for shares and changes, such as “accounted for,” “rose,” “declined,” and “the largest proportion,” and use them consistently.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts both simple and more extended sentences, but control is weak and errors frequently make relationships between ideas unclear. Examples include “Both countries was,” “the things came,” and “the India exports,” which show problems with agreement, tense, and article use. The sentence “In 2011, the India major exports in Germany despite the UK. is roughly 25 percent” is fragmented, and punctuation around “UK” further disrupts the meaning. Practise forming complete comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, for example, “Germany accounted for 25% of EU exports to India in 2011, while the UK’s share fell to 13%.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
