Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-20
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The chart below shows the EU exports of Goods to Asian countries( India and China) in 2000 and 2011.
First i will discuss about Exports of Goods to India in 2000 and 2011.
The largest exporters for India in 2000 were belgium,UK and Germany with the percentage of 25%, 29% and 15%.After these countires, France was ranked on 8%,Italy(7%), Netherlands(4%) and Austria(1%).While, Finland, Spain and sweden were 2%.The others were the reamining 5% exporters from EU.
In 2011, market changed its shape.Germany became the largest exporter with the percentage of 25%.Belgium became 20%, while Uk exports decreased sharply to 13%.France and Italy(9%).
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0
You identify several accurate features of India’s exports, including the leading shares in 2000 and the rise in Germany’s share alongside the fall in the UK’s. However, the response covers only India: the task also requires comparison with China in both years, and there is no overall summary of the main patterns. The 2011 account is incomplete, ending after France and Italy, and it gives no figures for several countries. The response is also 102 words, below the required 150, which leaves the report substantially underdeveloped. To improve, include a concise overview and select key comparisons across both destinations, such as Germany’s dominance in China and the contrasting changes in the UK’s shares.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response has a basic sequence, moving from India in 2000 to India in 2011, and the opening sentence establishes the subject. Some linking expressions, such as “After these” and “In 2011,” help the reader follow the order. However, the organisation is incomplete: there is no paragraph or section for China and no concluding overview, so the report does not progress through all the information in the task. Several details are crowded into long lists, while the final sentence stops abruptly after “France and Italy(9%).” Use separate paragraphs for the overview and the two destinations, and group figures by meaningful trends rather than listing countries one by one. This would create clearer progression and more purposeful cohesion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “largest exporters,” “percentage,” “ranked,” and “decreased sharply,” which makes the basic subject understandable. There is some attempt to describe change, particularly in “Germany became the largest exporter.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are awkward or imprecise, such as “market changed its shape” and “the others were the reamining 5% exporters.” Spelling and capitalisation slips, including “countires,” “belgium,” and “Uk,” also reduce accuracy. Aim for standard chart-reporting collocations such as “accounted for,” “share,” and “rose/fell,” and use “the remaining share” when referring to the “Other” category. More precise vocabulary would make comparisons clearer.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response mainly uses simple sentence patterns, with a few attempts to connect information using “while” and “after.” Basic meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical control is uneven. For example, “First i will discuss about Exports” uses an unnecessary future construction and an incorrect verb pattern; “France and Italy(9%)” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after full stops and commas, and the opening has an awkward space before the parenthesis. Practise complete comparative sentences, such as “Germany’s share rose to 25%, while the UK’s fell to 13%,” and check sentence boundaries, articles, and punctuation when editing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
