Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie charts illustrate exports from different EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Overall, in 2000, United Kingom was the largest exporter of India which was replaced by Germany in 2011. Germany was also the largest exporter in China in 2000 and 2011. Belgium holds the second position as highest exporter in India in 2000 and 2011 but did not hold a high position in China.

In 2000, United Kingdom held the first position in India as exporter accounting for 29 percentage of good in India. Belgium held the second position with 25 percentage. The proportion of United Kingdom decreased to 13 percent in 2011 and Germany took the first place by accounting for 25 percentage . The proportion of Belgium fell by 5 percentage but still held the second postion as the largest exporter.

In China, Germany was the top exporter by accounting for 38 percent in 2000 and 48 percentage for 2011. Belgium comprised only about 5 percent in both years. Italy,Netherlands and Spain remianed steady in bith India and China.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main pattern that the UK led exports to India in 2000 before Germany became the largest supplier, and you correctly report Germany’s leading share of China’s market in both years. The overview also notes Belgium’s importance in India and its smaller role in China. However, coverage is uneven: most detail concerns India, while China is represented mainly by Germany and Belgium. The claim that Italy, the Netherlands and Spain “remained steady” is too broad and inaccurate, since their shares changed in several cases and the statement does not clarify which market is meant. Include a few more precise comparisons, such as Germany’s rise in China and the UK’s decline there, to make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for India and China. This makes the main comparisons easy to locate, and phrases such as “In 2000” and “In China” help signal shifts in focus. Some connections are less clear, however. The final sentence groups three countries together and says they remained steady “in bith India and China,” without explaining the comparison or distinguishing the markets. Repeated use of “held” and “accounting for” also makes the progression somewhat mechanical. Organise the details around the most notable changes in each market and use clearer links between the figures and the overview.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “proportion,” “decreased,” “comprised,” and “largest exporter,” so the reader can understand the main trends. However, some expressions are imprecise or unnatural for describing shares: “29 percentage of good,” “first position … as exporter,” and “second postion as the largest exporter.” Prefer concise, accurate collocations such as “accounted for 29% of exports” and “ranked second.” There are also spelling errors, including “Kingom,” “postion,” “remianed,” and “bith,” which reduce accuracy. The range is adequate for the task, but more consistent use of precise terms for shares and rankings would make the description clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mixture of simple sentences and more developed structures, including “The proportion of United Kingdom decreased to 13 percent in 2011 and Germany took the first place.” Most sentences communicate the intended comparisons, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “United Kingom was the largest exporter of India” has an incorrect preposition and article pattern, while “29 percentage of good” lacks a suitable noun construction. In “Belgium holds the second position,” the present tense is inconsistent with the historical data. Punctuation is also uneven, with a space before the full stop after “percentage” and no space after the comma in “Italy,Netherlands.” Use past-tense reporting consistently and check articles, noun forms, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.