Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given pie chart elucidates information about EU exports of goods to india and china in 2000 and 2011 . The chart compares different categories and presents the data in number or percentages .

Overall , it can that there are noticeable differences among the categories shon in the chart . EU exports of goods to india 2000 the hight ratio and 2011 exports of below percentages . Furthermore , some categories show some fluctuations increment as well as decrement whereas for some cases they remain stable .

According to the chart , the first main activities 2000 eu exports of goods to india , Austria belo export of percentages in 1 , Belgium 25% , Finland 2% , France 8% , Germany 15% , Italy 7% , Netherlands 4% , Spain 2% , Sweden 2% , United kindom the huge exports the 29 percentages , other country 5 percentages . This show a clear comparison in all the categories .

Let's have a look at remaning information , 2011 eu exports of goods to india the different country sides Austria 2% , Belgium 20% , Finland 2% , France 9% , Germany 26% , Italy 9% , Netherlands 5% , Spain 3% , Sweden 3% , United kingdom 13% , the other country percentages 9% . Furthermore , all these process complete that there is no stability in all the activities .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies the topic and reports many figures for India in both years, including the UK’s 29% share in 2000 and Belgium’s 25%. However, it omits the China charts entirely, so it does not cover a major part of the task or make the required comparisons between destinations. The overview is also unclear: “the hight ratio” and “exports of below percentages” do not explain the main patterns. Some details are inaccurate, such as Germany’s India share in 2011 given as 26% rather than 25%. To improve, summarise the dominant features across both destinations—for example, Germany’s leading and growing share of exports to China—and select a few accurate comparisons rather than listing nearly every India figure.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is an attempt to organise the response into an introduction, overview and two detail paragraphs, and phrases such as “Overall” and “Furthermore” signal relationships. However, progression is weak because the response moves through India figures only and never reaches the China data. Several sentences are difficult to follow, including “EU exports of goods to india 2000 the hight ratio,” while “This show a clear comparison” does not specify what is being compared. Linking words are sometimes mechanical or do not clarify the relationship between ideas. Use a clear structure: introduction, overview of the main patterns, then one paragraph comparing India and China in 2000 and another describing changes by 2011. Ensure each sentence has a clear subject and purpose.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “exports,” “categories,” “percentages,” “fluctuations,” “increment” and “decrement,” and it attempts to describe change. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “first main activities,” “country sides,” “the huge exports” and “all these process complete.” Spelling errors, including “shon,” “remaning” and “kindom,” also reduce clarity. Repeated use of “percentages” and “categories” makes the description less precise. Build a small set of accurate chart phrases, such as “accounted for,” “share,” “rose,” “fell” and “remained unchanged,” and check spelling and collocations before finishing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both simple statements and longer sentences, but grammatical control is inconsistent and errors often make the meaning unclear. For example, “Overall, it can that there are noticeable differences” is missing a verb, and “EU exports of goods to india 2000 the hight ratio” lacks a complete sentence structure. There are also problems with articles, agreement and sentence boundaries, as in “This show a clear comparison” and the comma-separated lists that run on without clear sentence organisation. Capitalisation and spacing around punctuation are inconsistent. Practise writing complete subject–verb sentences first, then add clauses with accurate connectors. For instance, state that the UK accounted for 29% of exports to India in 2000, while Germany represented the largest share for China.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.