Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The pie charts represents about exportation from EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Overall,it is observed that in 2000 imports goods to india United Kingdom contains highest amount of share,whereas exports goods to china Germany recorded the largest share.In 2011 Germany shows relatively equal share in both India and China.Least share was Austria.

An analysis of the image reveals that in the year 2000 exports of goods to India Germany accounts for 29% which is the largest share ,follwed by belgium at 25%,Germany is the smallest share 15% and least percent is Austra is only 1%.

In contrast,exports of goods to china in 2000 majority of the share is Germany 38% which is very higest in the given time period and then least accounted for same to Austria for 2% .

An evident of the image proven that exports good to India in year 2000 Germany is again highest 25%,Belgium is 20% Austra and finland relatively equal at 2%.In addition exports goods to china in 2011 Germany has popular share for 48% ,france for 10% and Austria marked the smallest share same 2% considerbly.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify some important features, including Germany’s dominance in exports to China and the UK’s large share of exports to India in 2000. However, the overview is incomplete and several figures or comparisons are inaccurate, which limits how fully the charts are reported. For example, you say Germany had the largest Indian share in 2000 at 29%, but 29% belongs to the UK; Germany was 15%. You also describe Germany as highest for India in 2000 in the following paragraph, repeating the error. The 2011 India and China figures are partly covered, but the 2011 India overview is confused with 2000. Focus on accurate key changes: Germany rose in both markets, especially China, while the UK’s Indian share fell substantially.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic paragraph structure, with an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs, and you attempt to compare India with China using phrases such as “In contrast” and “In addition.” However, the progression is difficult to follow because the details are not consistently organised by year or destination, and the final paragraph incorrectly refers to India in 2000 before moving to China in 2011. Repetition of “An analysis of the image” and “An evident of the image” also makes the linking mechanical rather than clarifying relationships. Group the information consistently—for example, compare the two destinations in 2000, then in 2011—and use clear references to each year and market.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “share,” “largest,” “smallest,” and “in contrast,” so the reader can recognise that you are describing proportions. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning unclear. “Imports goods” is not appropriate for the charts, which show exports, while “popular share” and “very higest” do not express the intended comparison naturally. There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “follwed,” “Austra,” and “considerbly.” Use precise chart language consistently, such as “accounted for,” “represented,” and “percentage,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a few longer sentence patterns, including “whereas” and “In contrast,” but most sentences rely on simple structures, and errors are frequent enough to make some statements hard to interpret. For example, “The pie charts represents” has subject–verb disagreement, and “Germany accounts for 29% which is the largest share” lacks clear sentence control and reports a confusing relationship. Articles and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “exports goods to china in 2000 majority of the share is Germany.” Improve accuracy by using a clear subject and verb in each sentence, checking singular/plural agreement, and separating comparisons into complete sentences. Punctuate after introductory phrases and capitalise country names.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.