Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show exports from various EU countries to India and China in 2000 and 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

EU Exports of Goods to India and China in 2000 and 2011

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The following chart illustrates the percent of export from different European countries to India and China from 2000 to 2011.

Overall, this chart describes the exports of goods from EU to India in 2000.Export to Austria 1%, export to other countries 5%, export to United Kingdom 29%, export to Sweden 2%, export to Spain 2%, export to Netherlands 4%, export to Italy 7%, export to Germany 15%, export to France 8%,export to Finland 2%,and export to Belgium 25%.In 2011 it had experienced a significant increase export to Austria incrase to 2%, export to other countries to 9%, but export to United Kingdom decrease to 13%, export to Sweden increase to 3%, export to Netherlands increase to 5% export to Italy increase to 8%, export to Germany increase to 25%, export to France invrease to 9%, export to Finland remain same 2%, export to Belgium decrease to 20%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response identifies the topic and gives several figures for India in both years, so some relevant information is included. However, it does not adequately summarise the charts: the China data are omitted entirely, and there is no clear overview comparing the two destinations or highlighting their main patterns. The opening “Overall” sentence merely introduces a list of 2000 figures rather than stating a key feature. There is also a factual error: Italy’s share of exports to India in 2011 was 9%, not 8%. The response is 147 words, below the required 150. To improve, cover both destinations, select the most important contrasts, and verify figures against the charts.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence, moving from the topic to India in 2000 and then to changes in 2011. This gives the reader some sense of order, and the repeated country labels make individual figures identifiable. However, the long lists joined mainly by commas create run-on sentences and make the information difficult to scan. The transition “In 2011” signals a time change, but there is no paragraphing or clear progression across the four charts, especially because China is not discussed. Organise the response into an introduction, a concise overview, and separate comparison paragraphs for India and China. Use linking expressions to show the most important increases and decreases rather than listing every figure mechanically.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the general subject and several changes, using terms such as “exports,” “significant increase,” “decrease,” and “remain same.” However, the range is narrow and repetitive: “export to” is used repeatedly, and the response relies on basic change verbs without distinguishing shares from total export volumes. Some word choices and forms are inaccurate, including “percent of export” and “incrase” and “invrease”; these reduce precision and polish. Aim for more varied, accurate chart language, such as “accounted for,” “share,” “rose,” and “fell,” while avoiding claims about a “significant” change unless the data support that emphasis. Proofreading spelling would also improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response communicates many figures through simple clauses, but its sentence structures are limited and several errors recur. The opening, “The following chart illustrates the percent of export,” has an awkward grammatical construction, while “In 2011 it had experienced a significant increase export to Austria incrase to 2%” contains faulty tense and sentence structure. The long comma-linked lists also lack reliable sentence boundaries; for example, the 2000 figures are presented as one extended sequence. There are some attempts to describe change, but verb forms and agreement are not consistently controlled, as in “export … decrease” and “export … remain same.” Use complete, shorter sentences with consistent past-tense verbs and accurate punctuation, and vary sentence patterns carefully.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.