Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Big porpotion of countries school are mixed, and both female and male students can learn together however not everyone agrees with this system and they believe that students could benefit more if schools were single-sex schools. Although I can understand both sides, I somewhat believe that mixed schools are important to an individuals communication skills.

School with both genders allow individuals to communicate better with the opposite gender. I strongly believe that if a young person is not exposed to different people and genders they cannot learn to communicate effectively. For instance if a child is kept inside with only their own gender they won't learn how the opposite gender opperates or how to act around them. mixed school in that sense supports humans to communicate to the opposite gender by bringing them together in a class or an activity. This helps both genders understand each other better therefore communicate with each other without it feeling difficult.

Although mixed schools are better for a persons communucation skills, there are many drawback. For example in a single-sex school the school can focus more on how that specific gender learns and support them better, also the students might be able to focus more. However that is not to say that the education is better. Because if a person learns only in a single-sex school it could bring them more harm than good in studies, the school methods might not work with them also there is more pressure of fitting in while in a mixed school there isn't. For example it has been studied that single-sex schools are more prone to bullying, which therefore can mess up with ones education.

In conclusion although single sex school might sound more appeling to the education, I strongly believe that mixed schools are more importsnt for the individuals communicaion and studying skills

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you somewhat favour mixed schools, especially because they help students communicate across genders. You address both sides by noting that single-sex schools may tailor teaching and help students focus, then explaining why you still prefer mixed education. These points are relevant, but some are less fully developed than others. The communication argument includes an example of students learning how to interact, while the claims that single-sex schools create more pressure and are more prone to bullying are asserted without much explanation or support. To strengthen the response, explain how these effects influence learning and qualify broad claims with a specific example or reasoning. A more precise conclusion would also restate the main comparison rather than introduce “studying skills” without developing that idea.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs consider the benefits and drawbacks of the school types, and a conclusion returns to your preference. Linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Although,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main direction. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. In the second body paragraph, “However that is not to say that the education is better” does not clearly identify which school type is being compared, and the shift from focus to pressure and bullying could be signposted more logically. The long opening sentence also combines several ideas. Use clearer topic sentences and explicit references to “single-sex schools” or “mixed schools” to make the progression easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “opposite gender,” “focus,” “fitting in,” and “bullying.” There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “exposed to different people and genders.” However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word choices are noticeable and sometimes distract the reader: “porpotion,” “opperates,” “communucation,” and “appeling” are examples. Some collocations are also awkward, including “school methods might not work with them” and “mess up with ones education.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural academic phrasing, such as “teaching methods may not suit every student” and “disrupt their education.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent without changing your ideas.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession clause (“Although I can understand both sides”) and conditional structures (“if a young person is not exposed…”). Most of the meaning remains clear, but some grammatical errors occur in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and punctuation. For example, the opening sentence is a run-on, “School with both genders allow” has a singular/plural agreement problem, and “a persons communication skills” needs a possessive form. Several sentences also begin with “Because” or “For example” without being smoothly connected to the preceding idea. Practise separating long sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, possessives, and sentence punctuation. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.