Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Education is an essential part of everyone's life. it is argued by some individual's that providing an education to girls and boys seperately in single-sex school are more benefited.while,other think that in many part of the global girls or boys are educated together in co-educational or in mixed schools. They both the views has their own advantages. we will shed light on both the views.

To begin with, Education provided to childrens give them a moral value in their life.althought, studying in a co-educational schools they are working in a teamwork which enhance the confidence of the child.also boost the mutual understanding which generate mutual respect to each other or boost the communication skills.for example:- A students who works on a team they all share their ideas that thing boost communication or confidence.

beyond this, study in single-sex schools gives a students less distraction or more concentration.because focus is most crucial in study. For example, girls studying in an all-girls school may feel more comfortable participating in classroom discussions.

To conclude, education in co-educational school they are working in a team or boost the major skills in children.apart from this, the childres who studied in single-sex schools are more comfortable to participate on schools different skills.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You introduce both school types and give relevant points: mixed schools may build teamwork and communication, while single-sex schools may reduce distraction and help girls feel comfortable speaking. However, the response only partially answers “to what extent” you agree: the conclusion repeats benefits but does not clearly state your own position or weigh them. The examples are brief and the claims are not sufficiently explained, so the discussion remains limited and under-developed. The response contains 199 words, so it is 51 words below the required minimum; the 8 words copied from the prompt were not counted. Use the extra space to state your position clearly and develop each reason with a specific explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin with,” “beyond this” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the discussion. However, progression between ideas is not always clear: the introduction promises to discuss both views, but the essay does not establish a clear line of argument, and the conclusion largely repeats earlier points. Several sentences run together, while connectors such as “also” and “apart from this” are used mechanically. Organise each paragraph around one main claim, explain it, and then connect it explicitly to your overall position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “co-educational,” “single-sex schools,” “mutual understanding,” “concentration” and “participating in classroom discussions.” This gives the response enough basic language to communicate its main ideas. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes meaning less clear: “more benefited,” “a moral value” and “different skills” do not express the intended ideas naturally. Spelling and word-form errors, including “seperately,” “childrens” and “childres,” are also noticeable. Build a bank of accurate phrases for discussing educational outcomes, and check spelling and collocations when revising.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a relative clause in “A students who works on a team.” However, complex attempts are often faulty, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles and punctuation occur frequently enough to make parts difficult to follow. For example, “They both the views has their own advantages” has incorrect word order and subject–verb agreement, while “studying in a co-educational schools they are working in a teamwork” lacks a clear grammatical structure. Capitalisation after full stops and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check each sentence for agreement and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.