Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many places of the world it is common to have mixed gender schools where boys and girls are schooled together. Opponents of the above idea argue that separate gender schools are viable compared to mixed schools and that this structure will ensure a breakthrough in academics for both boys and girls.

While I agree with the anti-mixed school proposals,I also feel that children learning together without being separated based on gender is crucial to individuals growth. Both genders will learn crucial tasks from each other and interdependence will be uplifted.

Mixed schools offer learners with an opportunity for mutual-social understanding where boys can tolerate girls and vice varsa. Health friendly ties will be cultivated in such an environment and vices like male chauvinism can be effortlessly be dealt with. Female students will feel safe in the hands of their male counterparts. For instance many schools in developed nations are largely mixed and you find good relationships between male and female students which is resultant in future life.

Conversely, one gender schools carry its fundamental advantages. Most performing learning institution are those that are either pro-girls or pro-boys.This indicates that when either boys or girls are studying without the distraction of the other, they tend to concentrate and steer sterling performance. Take for example the most performing schools in Kenya are either boys or girls boarding schools among the high schools.

Cases of sexual relationships are going to be reduced significantly through adoption of one gender schools. Boys alone can prosper as well as girls alone.

While the debate rages, I propose that the world of learning can assess the possibility of good learning environment for the children by looking at the bigger picture of the aims of education. Yes,we can have a balanced approach between the two notions to ensure achievement of national goals of education.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the question and give a position that recognises benefits in mixed schools while also supporting some arguments for single-sex education. Relevant points include mutual understanding and reduced gender-based prejudice, alongside the possibility of improved concentration and fewer sexual relationships in single-sex schools. The Kenya example helps make the academic-performance point more concrete. However, your stance is not fully consistent: “I agree with the anti-mixed school proposals” suggests strong support for separation, while your conclusion recommends a “balanced approach.” Some claims, such as that female students will feel safe and that single-sex schools perform better, are asserted rather than explained or qualified. Clarify the extent of your agreement and develop the main reasons with more precise support.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, discussion of mixed schools, a contrasting paragraph on single-sex schools, and a conclusion. “Conversely” signals the shift between the two positions, and the final paragraph attempts to bring them together. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes loose: the mixed-school paragraph moves from tolerance to safety and then to relationships in later life without clearly explaining the links. The conclusion’s “balanced approach” is also not specified, so it does not fully resolve the contrast established earlier. Some linking is mechanical, and punctuation around transitions is inconsistent. Group related claims more tightly and use clear references to show how each example supports the point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “interdependence,” “male chauvinism,” “distraction,” and “national goals of education.” These choices show an effort to express ideas beyond basic terms. However, several phrases are inaccurate or unnatural and sometimes make the intended meaning less clear: “mutual-social understanding,” “vice varsa,” “health friendly ties,” and “most performing learning institution.” There are also word-form and collocation problems, such as “resultant in future life” and “pro-girls or pro-boys.” Aim for precise, natural combinations rather than elevated wording that does not fit the context. For example, “mutual understanding,” “healthy relationships,” and “high-performing schools” would communicate your points more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and more complex forms, including a conditional construction in “when either boys or girls are studying without the distraction of the other, they tend to concentrate.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Subject–verb agreement is inaccurate in “one gender schools carry its fundamental advantages” and “Most performing learning institution are.” There are also problems with articles and sentence construction, as in “Female students will feel safe in the hands of their male counterparts,” where the phrasing does not clearly express the intended general claim. Punctuation and spacing are inconsistent, particularly around commas and full stops. Review agreement, singular and plural forms, and sentence boundaries, then proofread for punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.