Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowaday,its most controvial debate among the people that girls and boys are educated togather or educated separately.

In my opinion,it is best idea to educate them in mixed school.

There are alot of benefits for them .

First of all, they can build there strong bonds.it is possible because they can share their ideas with eachothers.

They can also communicate in different ways to solve their problems

So, the victom card of girls and boys will be finish and all are equal in their educational system.

They can also get experience to how girls and boys are equal every race of life.

On the other hand,girls also get opportunity to participate in games that are just for boys and its typical thinking of the people that some sports are particularly for the boys.

Subsequantily,girls will be perfom better if they will participate in the games.

And games also bulid passion and confient in girls.

The girls will be more confident and more prominant in every sports.

They will also get opportunity to perfom in a international level.

Anthore reason ,why i am supporting this idea is that girls also get freedom as they are free to choose their career and they will perfom better.

In conculsion,the benefits are more in co -educated sytem.

In addition,girls and boys both will be more passionate and more self confident to prove themself.

And the concepts of girls and boys will be vanish.

Gender equality should be promoted in this.

And every one has equal rights.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a clear preference for mixed schooling in the opening and conclusion, and your points about communication, equality, sports participation and career choice are relevant to the question. However, the response only partly develops the comparison with single-sex education: it does not explain what benefits separate schools might offer or directly weigh those against your reasons for co-education. Several claims, such as “the victim card … will be finish” and girls performing better in sports, are difficult to interpret or are asserted without a supporting example. To strengthen the response, explain each main reason with a clear cause-and-effect link and a specific example, while acknowledging the opposing view before explaining why you disagree with it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic overall shape: an introduction, a sequence of supporting points, a contrast signalled by “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. Some linking phrases, including “First of all,” “Subsequently” and “In conclusion,” help identify stages in the argument. However, ideas are not grouped into clear paragraphs, and the progression is difficult to follow because several points appear abruptly or repeat one another. For example, the claims about confidence and sports participation are spread across short statements, while “the concepts … will be vanish” is unclear and does not connect smoothly to the conclusion. Use separate paragraphs for your main reasons and the opposing view, and make references and transitions precise rather than relying on a list of connectors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, such as “co-educational system,” “participate,” “career” and “gender equality,” and these choices show an effort to discuss education and social outcomes. However, the range is limited and several spelling errors or inaccurate expressions make parts of the argument hard to understand. Examples include “controvoial,” “victom card,” “prominant” and “confient”; phrases such as “every race of life” and “concepts … will be vanish” are also unclear or unnatural. Build a more accurate set of topic-related collocations and check spelling carefully. For instance, express the idea as “challenge gender stereotypes” rather than “the concepts … will be vanish,” and use “equal opportunities” when discussing fairness.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You use some simple sentences and attempt longer structures, including “it is possible because they can share their ideas” and “girls also get freedom as they are free to choose their career.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction, verb forms, articles and punctuation occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. For example, “the victim card … will be finish” has an incorrect verb form, while “if they will participate” uses an unsuitable tense pattern after “if.” Missing sentence boundaries also create run-ons, as in “they can build there strong bonds.it is possible.” Practise forming accurate complex sentences, especially conditionals and clauses with “because,” and use full stops and commas consistently.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.