Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Most of the people in the world prefer to admit their children in co-Education. While some people believe that it is better to study separate gender schools. In my opinion, it is better to study in co-Educational institutes that single-sex schools.

Firstly, i believe that it is good for our culture to study in Co-Educational institutes because it reduce some negative impacts. Some parents prefer to join their children in single gender schools that definitely effect their future education system. People who are studying in gender wise educational system are make themselves comfortable with their common gender. Whereas if they suddenly need to work with other sexual gender, it feek like very uncomfortable and can't even express our intension. So, we need to work together with all genders then we feel free to speak out which is useful in working time.

Secondly, after our studies we need to travel somewhere for our job purpose or interviews. In that time, need to survive alone without any other guidance. If we feel uncomfortable to speakout to opposite gender then how we survive in our daily life. So, studying in Co-Educatinal institutes from childhood is better to move forward for higher opportunities without fear.

In conclusion, many of the countries people educated their children in Co-Education,While some believe that it has advantages for separate gender schools. Meanwhile, admit their in Co-Education is more benefits than separate gender schools. Moreover, it helps to survive easy with our proffessional life. Educating in separate gender schools may impact in future communication skills with opposite gender.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you favour co-educational schools, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons. You explain that studying together can help students feel more comfortable communicating across genders, then connect this to later work and interviews. These points address the question, but some are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that single-sex education “definitely effect[s] their future education system” is unclear, and the conclusion repeats the benefits without adding a developed example or qualification. To strengthen the response, explain the cause-and-effect links more precisely and support one point with a specific, relevant example. This would make the argument more fully developed and balanced across the task.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs organised by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion. The ideas also progress from communication at school to interactions in adult working life, which gives the essay an overall direction. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening “While some people believe…” is a fragment, and “In that time, need to survive alone” does not clearly link its subject to the previous sentence. The conclusion’s “Meanwhile” does not express the intended contrast, while “Moreover” introduces a repeated point. Use linking expressions only when their relationship is accurate, and make references such as “their” and “it” unmistakably clear. This would make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “single-sex schools,” “opposite gender,” “communication skills,” and “professional life,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making meaning unclear. For instance, “admit their children in” is not the natural expression for enrolling children, and “common gender” does not clearly convey the intended meaning. There are also spelling and form errors such as “feek,” “Co-Educatinal,” and “proffessional.” Build a more precise set of phrases for education and social interaction, and check spelling and collocations carefully. More accurate wording would help you express your ideas with less repetition.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if we suddenly need to work with other…,” and most of the argument remains understandable. However, some errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation reduce accuracy. For example, “While some people believe…” is a dependent clause without a main clause, “it reduce” needs subject–verb agreement, and “People who are studying… are make themselves comfortable” combines verb forms incorrectly. The sentence beginning “In that time, need to survive…” also lacks a clear subject. Practise building complete sentences and checking each verb against its subject; then review articles and sentence boundaries. This will make your varied structures more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.