Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The phonomenon of co-education is quitely common in modern societies.Consequently, there are many educational institues that promote co-education at every level.However, it is the commom perception and i strongly agree that girls and boys become more comfortable if they get education in separate schooling system.This essay will discuss how separate schooling can be beneficial for both genders.

In this modern era, Co-education is generally acceptable in most of the communities.Some people believed that there should not be any discrimination based on ethnicity,cultural background and specially gender in education.Students learn effectively when they interact with different genders specially based on group activities , Research work.For instance, some projects require male to go in the far areas or for heavy work.Meanwhile, some researches need female to communicate with the participants, presentation and collecting data from participants with religious values.Co-education brings some cons and pros such as students get involved in romantically and emotionally rather than focused on studies.

On the other hand, separate schooling system is preferred in most parts of the Asian countries due to some cultural and religiuos restrictions.For instance , some parents could not allow girls to get education in co-education system.I agree with this statement because separate education involves less distraction from opposite gender, students can comfortable to participates and perform effeciently in the classrooms.On the contrary, mixed system can be more distracting for many learners in most of the institues and there is no check and balance from the authorities in this regard.

Overall, co-education is going smoothly in most EU countries and in elite classes. However, people with religious and cultural norms preferred schools that provides separate education and it is the basic right of every individual to acquire education regardless of gender.Therefore, in my opinion, separate institues should be available at every part of the world to make it convenient for everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address the question and state a preference for separate schooling, especially in the introduction and conclusion. You also acknowledge advantages of mixed education, such as learning through interaction and group work, which helps make the response relevant to both sides. However, the position is not fully consistent: the opening says you strongly agree that students are more comfortable in separate schools, while the conclusion mainly argues that separate schools should be available as an option. Several supporting points are asserted rather than explained—for example, that mixed schools cause romantic distraction or lack authority oversight. Develop these claims with clearer reasoning or a specific example, and make your degree of agreement explicit throughout. This would make the response more fully developed and focused.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, discussion of mixed education, a paragraph supporting separate schools, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “On the other hand” and “Overall” help signal the stages of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several ideas are placed together without clear links. The examples about heavy work, communicating with participants, and religious values do not clearly support the same point, and the contrast between the body paragraphs and the conclusion is not fully resolved. Some linking phrases are also used mechanically. Organise each paragraph around one main claim, explain how each example supports it, and use clearer referencing to connect ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “co-education,” “discrimination,” “cultural background,” and “religious restrictions,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “acquire education.” This gives you enough range to discuss the issue, but inaccurate word choice, spelling, and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less clear. Examples include “quitely common,” “educational institues,” “commom perception,” and “students can comfortable to participates.” Phrases such as “there is no check and balance” and “co-education is going smoothly” are also not natural in this context. Build a bank of accurate collocations for education and argumentation, and proofread spelling and word forms so your ideas are expressed more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because” and “when,” and the overall meaning is generally recoverable. However, errors occur across sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and verb forms. For example, “students can comfortable to participates” needs a correctly formed verb phrase, while “schools that provides” has a subject–verb agreement problem. There are also missing spaces after full stops and commas, and some sentences join several ideas in ways that make their relationships unclear. These issues sometimes slow the reader, even though the main argument can usually be understood. Practise accurate clause construction and agreement, and check punctuation and sentence boundaries during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.