Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Boys and girls beeing educated together in co-educatinal schools is a commend practice in schools all around the world. Some people think that girls and boys would benefit from being educated separately. I believe this is not the case and mixed schools prepare the students better for their future jobs.

Critics often point out the sport or PE class in co-educational schools. And they have a reason for that. In class rooms with just boys or girls it is easier for the teacher to look after everyones needs. The differnent genders are often not exeactly on the same level ,which can make a lessen easily to hart or boring for some students. Boys might enjoy football a lot but many girls do not like it one bit.

A benefit of educating both genders in the same school is however, that it is more like real live. In the future most school girls and boys will work in a job together with the oposite gender. They should learn how to understand and respect eachother. If they go to a mixed school, they allready know what its like to study together. Boys and girls can work together on class projects or play with oneanother at the school playground.

In conclusion a single-sex school might be the superior system to look after every students needs and give them a specific education. But a school is there to prepare the students for the world. A mixed school does that better because at uni or a job every place is mixed with both genders. This is why I do not agree that sinle-sex schools bring a benefit boys and girls.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree that single-sex schools offer greater benefits, and you return to this view in the conclusion. You address both sides by acknowledging that separate classes may help teachers respond to students’ needs, then explaining that mixed schools prepare young people to work and study with people of another gender. These are relevant reasons, but they are not developed equally. The point about PE is brief and relies on a broad claim about girls and football, while the preparation-for-work argument would be stronger with a specific example or fuller explanation of how studying together builds cooperation and respect. Develop each main reason with more precise support to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting a concern about mixed schools, a paragraph supporting them, and a conclusion. The progression from the opposing view to your own position is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “however” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the argument. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent arrangement and also shows some stronger control through purposeful paragraphing. However, some connections feel mechanical or unclear: “Critics often point out the sport or PE class” does not clearly introduce the specific concern, and “And they have a reason for that” is a fragment-like transition. Use more precise topic sentences and connect each example explicitly to the paragraph’s main claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough vocabulary to communicate the central argument, including relevant terms such as “co-educational schools,” “single-sex school,” “respect,” and “class projects.” However, the range is limited, and several spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “commond,” “differnent,” “exeactly,” “oposite,” and “sinle-sex.” Some phrases are also imprecise or unnatural, such as “real live,” “look after everyones needs,” and “a lessen easily to hart or boring.” These errors sometimes make the reader pause to interpret your meaning, which limits the effectiveness of the vocabulary. Build accuracy by checking spelling carefully and learning natural collocations for school, learning, and workplace contexts.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “a school is there to prepare the students for the world” and a conditional structure in “If they go to a mixed school, they allready know what its like to study together.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur. For example, “Boys and girls beeing educated together … is a commend practice” has an incorrect verb form and article, while “every students needs” has a number-agreement error. The sentence beginning “Critics often point out the sport or PE class” is also awkwardly followed by “And they have a reason for that.” Review verb forms, articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, while continuing to practise complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.