Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, co-education plays a pivotal role in modern society. Some people argue that boys and girls should be taught in single-sex schools, while others contend that co-education helps build confidence and communication skills. I partially agree with the first view, but I believe that common education is beneficial overall.

To begin with, many educational institutes provide the facility of co-educational programs, which helps an individual in their practical life (communicating with alternative genders). Not only that, but also many people prefer joint education to get along with others or to erase their hesitation. In addition, some people believe in the concept of gender equality that both men and women should be provided equal rights. For an instance, a student who is taught in shared learning will be more confident and experienced in communicating with other people.

However, many people believe that students who are educated separately get more benefits by getting evolved in an environment which is basically made for a separate gender. Nevertheless, teachers do not have to manage or adjust a different type behavior for students. Furthermore, they can adopt a technique for students in which they do not feel any type of hesitation or confusion to ask questions. As a result, they can focus on their studies and can obtain better marks despite felling uncomfortable in joint education.

In conclusion, single sex education can be effective for students in studies or for teachers to teach their students in the ideal environment. But it cannot build a student for the hardships of his life(lack of confidence, interacting with opposite sex). That's why it is mandatory to educate our children in co-education.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partially accept the case for single-sex schools but conclude that co-education is more beneficial. You address both sides, giving relevant reasons such as confidence, communication, and a less distracting environment for study. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The point that separate schools allow teachers to adapt their methods is asserted rather than explained, and the claim that students may achieve better marks needs support or an example. Your discussion of co-education also relies on broad statements about confidence and gender equality. To strengthen the response, explain how each proposed benefit works in practice and connect your examples more directly to the question of which system benefits students overall.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, separate paragraphs consider the two systems, and a conclusion restates your preference. The progression is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers recognise the stages of the argument. This meets the lower-band expectations and shows some flexibility in organising contrasting views. At times, though, linking is mechanical or the relationship between ideas is unclear. For example, “Nevertheless” does not clearly contrast with the preceding point about separate education, while “Not only that, but also” introduces a loosely connected claim. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the logical connection between each reason and its supporting explanation explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “co-educational,” “gender equality,” “hesitation,” and “ideal environment,” and the main ideas remain understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “pivotal role” and “obtain better marks.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “alternative genders” is not the intended expression, “getting evolved in an environment” is awkward, and “a different type behavior” is incorrectly formed. Spelling and word-form slips such as “felling” also reduce control. Aim for natural collocations and check that each word expresses the intended meaning; a smaller set of precise phrases will be more effective than elevated but unsuitable wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex structures, including the contrast introduced by “while” and the result clause beginning “As a result.” The overall meaning is usually clear, and some sentences are controlled, such as “I partially agree with the first view, but I believe that common education is beneficial overall.” However, there are some errors in sentence construction and grammatical patterns. For example, “a student who is taught in shared learning” is awkwardly structured, and “teachers do not have to manage or adjust a different type behavior” lacks a clear grammatical construction. The final sentence also joins a parenthetical explanation to the main clause without clear punctuation. Review article use, sentence boundaries, and the structure of clauses, while continuing to vary sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.