Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this modren and advance era, girls and boys are getting the education in the same class and same institution in the co-education, but there is a section of people which belive that boys and girls must get education seperatly. Although single-sex education has its own benefits but I firmly disagree with the idea of single-sex education because co-education can help the students to develope the mutual respect and healty competiition between both genders.

On the one hand, single-sex education has it's own significace which can not be neglected. It offers the students to focus on the education with less distraction. Students can express thier experiences and their feeling without any hesitaion. For instance students feels more uncomfortable while expressing themselves in the co-education than single-sex education. In such conditions single-sex education provides the better enviroment for students to express their feeling more confidently. Furthermore, teachers can also make and apply the strategies accroding to the situation.

On the other hand, co-education has it's own benefits. It helps the students to build the confidence to face the real time pressure. It prepares students for real time expirence to communicate with other genders. For instance, every student must have to do a job where they have to intract with the oposite gender as well to survive. It requires strong communication skills and confidence as well. This will help to build a healthy competition between the genders.

To conclude, I firmly disagree with the idea of single-sex classrooms because education is not only about reading and getting theoretical knowledge but it is about building the mutual respect and having the strong social and communication skills and co-education plays a significant role in building a society like this.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you firmly disagree with single-sex education and support co-education. You address both sides by acknowledging that single-sex schools may reduce distraction and help students express themselves, then explaining how mixed schools can build confidence, communication skills and mutual respect. These are relevant reasons, but some are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that students will need to interact with the opposite gender at work would be stronger with a specific example or a clearer explanation of how school prepares them for this. The conclusion restates your view effectively, though developing the main supporting points more fully would make the response more convincing and complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs presenting the two perspectives, and a conclusion. The contrast signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the argument, and the final paragraph returns to your position. However, some links between ideas are mechanical, and the progression within paragraphs could be smoother. In the first body paragraph, the points about reduced distraction, expressing feelings and teachers adapting strategies are listed without showing clearly how they connect. Similarly, “This will help to build a healthy competition” has an unclear reference. Use linking and referencing that explain the relationship between each claim and its support, rather than relying mainly on standard transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “mutual respect,” “healthy competition,” “communication skills” and “theoretical knowledge.” These phrases help express your central argument, and the reader can generally understand your meaning. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word combinations reduce accuracy, as in “modren,” “develope,” “real time expirence” and “intract with the oposite gender.” Some wording is also repetitive, particularly references to “students” and “education.” Aim to check spelling carefully and choose more natural collocations; for example, “prepare students for real-life interactions” is clearer than “prepares students for real time expirence.” A broader range of precise expressions would make the argument more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “Although single-sex education has its own benefits…” and a relative clause in “where they have to…” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main ideas remain understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “Students feels” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “every student must have to do a job” combines modal forms incorrectly. There are also issues with articles and sentence construction, such as “provides the better environment” and the awkward structure “they have to interact… as well to survive.” Review agreement, article use and modal verbs, and edit longer sentences to ensure each clause is grammatically complete and natural.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.