Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The many nations in world educated boys and girls together in co-education or mixed schools. cartain people contend that girls and boys educated well from being educated saperately in single sex schools reither then in co-education.I agree with that point of view bause, when children educate saperatly this enhance their focus on study.
on the one hand, some countries like USA and UK educate studends together due to their mixed culture yet it generate some big problems. for instance, when girls and boys lean together than they do not on their education because opposite gender attracks that' s why they try to inspire each other. sometimes, they can waste money to buy thinks for friend. These all the problems distracts studends to perform well.when one students is personally attached with other then he feel uncomfortable without him or her.
on the other hand, when girls and boys educated saperatly. This opproach make students mined free and relaxed. This helps students to study with consistency and improve their performace with bit effort. The good think that student can spent all the time to study reither than to talk with others such as girl or boys. Moreover, same gender understand each other better than opposite gender.
To sum up, educate girls and boys saperatly is most beneficial than co-education. saperate education ehance understanding and study consistently. In contrast, co-education only distracts students and students performance become low. In my opinion, saperate education has lot of benefits reither than co-education due to its problems
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
Your position is clear: you agree that single-sex education is more beneficial, and you give relevant reasons, including fewer distractions and more time to focus on study. The response also acknowledges mixed schools and offers examples of possible social distractions. However, the discussion is only partly developed. For instance, the claim that students of the same gender “understand each other better” is not explained, and the points about spending money on friends and feeling uncomfortable when separated are asserted rather than supported with a clear example or explanation. To strengthen the response, develop each main reason with a specific illustration and consider the benefits of co-education before reaching a balanced conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signposted by “on the one hand” and “on the other hand,” and a concluding paragraph. This gives the reader an overall route through your argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “These all the problems distracts students” does not clearly link the preceding examples, while “In contrast” in the conclusion introduces a contrast that is not fully explained. Several ideas are also crowded together in the body paragraphs, making the progression less smooth. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and make sure pronouns such as “they” and “him or her” have unmistakable references.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “co-education,” “single sex schools,” “distract,” and “consistency.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, spelling, and word-form errors make parts of the argument difficult to follow. Examples include “cartain,” “saperatly,” “attracks,” and “performace,” as well as unnatural phrases such as “students mined free” and “inspire each other” where the intended meaning is unclear. Repetition of “students,” “study,” and “problems” also limits precision. Build a reliable set of topic-specific expressions and check spelling and collocations; for example, describe students as “less distracted” rather than saying they “do not on their education.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a contrast introduced by “when.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, verb forms, agreement, and articles sometimes make meaning difficult to understand. For example, “The many nations in world educated boys and girls together” lacks a clear grammatical structure, and “when girls and boys educated separately” is missing an auxiliary verb. In “These all the problems distracts students,” the sentence structure and subject–verb agreement are faulty. Practise forming complete clauses with accurate subjects and verbs, and check agreement and articles when editing. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.