Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-08-18
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
While co-educational schools are common in many countries, some argue that students benefit more from being educated seperatly in single-sex institutions. Although single-sex education can offer certain advantages, I believe that co-educational schools are more beneficial overall because they promote social development and better prepare students for life beyond school.
One potential advantage of single-sex education is that it may allow students to concentrate more effectively on their studies. Without some of the social pressures that can arise between teenage boys and girls, certain students may feel less distracted in the classroom and devote more attention to their academic work. For example, teenagers who are particularly concerned about peer approval may find it easier to participate in lessons and complete assignments when they are not preoccupies with relationships or social interactions. As a result, single-sex schools can provide a focused learning environment that may benefit students who are easily distracted by their social surroundings.
However, I believe that studying alongside members of the opposite sex provides more significant long-term benefits. In adult life, people are expected to communicate and cooperate with individuals of different genders in universities, workplaces and wider society. Co-educational schools give students opportunities to develop these interpersonal skills from an early age. For instance, group projects involving both boys and girls can teach students how to listen to different perspectives, resolve disagreements and work towards a common objective. Such experiences can improve students' communication skills and help them become more confident when interacting with a diverse range of people.
Furthermore, separating students according to gender may reinforce unnecessary stereotypes. When boys and girls regularly study together, they are more likely to recognise that academic abilities and interests vary between individuals rather than being determined by gender. This can encourage greater mutual respect and create a more inclusive educational environment.
In conclusion, although single-sex schools may help some students maintain greater academic concentration, I believe that the advantages of co-educational education are more substantial. By encouraging communication, cooperation and mutual understanding, mixed schools better prepare young people for the diverse social and professional environments they will encounter in later life.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response fully addresses all parts of the task. You have clearly stated your position in the introduction and maintained it throughout the essay. Each paragraph is well-developed with relevant arguments, such as the focus on social development and the preparation for adult life. The ideas are extended logically, and you have provided clear examples, such as the mention of group projects and workplace collaboration. The conclusion effectively summarizes your main points and reinforces your stance. The response is well-balanced, acknowledging the opposing view before providing a strong counter-argument, which demonstrates a high level of task response.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between paragraphs is smooth, using effective linking phrases like 'However,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In conclusion.' Cohesive devices are used naturally and appropriately throughout the text. For example, the use of 'For instance' and 'As a result' helps to connect supporting details to main arguments effectively. The paragraphing is logical and contributes to the overall clarity of the essay. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of cohesive devices, making the flow of the argument easy to follow.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
You demonstrate a good range of vocabulary that is appropriate for an academic context. Phrases like 'interpersonal skills,' 'inclusive educational environment,' and 'diverse social and professional environments' show a strong command of language. There are a few minor spelling errors, such as 'seperatly' instead of 'separately' and 'preoccupies' instead of 'preoccupied,' but these do not impede communication. The vocabulary is generally precise and fits the topic well. To reach a higher band, you could incorporate more sophisticated collocations or idiomatic expressions, but the current range is sufficient to convey your ideas clearly and effectively.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0
The essay uses a variety of complex sentence structures effectively. You demonstrate good control over subordinate clauses and conditional structures, which enhances the sophistication of your writing. The majority of your sentences are error-free, and the few minor slips, such as the spelling errors mentioned previously, do not affect the clarity of your message. Punctuation is generally accurate, and the grammar supports the logical flow of your arguments. You have shown a good ability to manage complex ideas while maintaining grammatical accuracy, which is a hallmark of a high-scoring response.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.