Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people believe that it is more advantageous if girls and boys are in single gender schools, as many countries have adopted the concept of co-education. This essay disagrees with this belief because of the today's modern age requirements.

The past educational institues used to teach students in separate buildings, each specified for same gender. This technique was useful in those times, however the recent development in education departments has made the co-education common. A specific community with backward beliefs did not like the idea of mixing both genders in the same class due to some of its drawbacks. Advangtages of avoiding co-edcation are mere as compared to past. While studying in co-education, mutual interaction can cause some problems including bullying and physical contact. The trend of physical relationship is increasing mostly among college and university fellows as they gets attracted by opposite gender and it leads to severe consequenses which can affect their personal lives.

Although there are some concerns people show regarding mutual education, it has a large number of benefits that it has became the basic need of each region. whenever, girls and boys are being educated under the same roof, it builds their confidence and develop soft skills as they behave nicely before opposite gender. This experience of daily interation of both genders enables strengthen their communication skills in professional life. For instance, consider a girl from rural area where she had studied only with girls and even all the teachers were female. After completing the degree, she got a chance to work for a company with both genders. She will obviously face the interaction problems and might have gotten confused during presentations due to lack of communication skills with men.

I totally disagree with the concept of learning in separate gerder schools, as the modern reforms require co-education and to survive in this century, our generation should be more confident and it is possible only if they face the opposite sex everyday in schools and colleges.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position against single-sex education. The ideas are relevant, particularly the discussion on soft skills and professional preparation. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The argument regarding the 'drawbacks' of co-education, such as 'bullying' and 'physical relationship', is a bit underdeveloped and relies on generalizations. The essay would benefit from more nuanced reasoning to support the claim that these issues are less significant than the benefits of co-education. Overall, the position is consistent throughout the essay, and the main points are clearly presented, meeting the requirements for a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central theme. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Although', 'For instance', and 'However', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'whenever, girls and boys are being educated'. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. The paragraphing is appropriate, and there is a clear progression of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion, which justifies a Band 6.0 score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the student to express their opinion clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'co-education', 'modern reforms', and 'soft skills'. However, there are several instances of imprecise word choice and minor errors, such as 'educational institues' (spelling), 'same gender' (should be 'the same gender'), and 'separate gerder schools' (spelling). The range is sufficient to communicate the message, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band. The errors do not impede communication, placing this at a Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('as they gets attracted') and article usage ('in rural area'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some awkward phrasings that affect the flow. The complexity of the sentences is present, but the accuracy is inconsistent. Because the errors are noticeable but do not prevent the reader from understanding the argument, the response aligns with the Band 6.0 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.