Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is undeniable that, discrimination on the basis of sex, race or caste are pensive concern in this economy. In this regards, in many parts of the different countries girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools while some believe that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. I agree to a large extent with this notion due to many reasons which will be outlined in forthcoming fragments with logical conclusion.
To commence with, there are several positive reasons in view of educating together in co-educational schools. The prime one is that, it creates a real-life skills among students. To explain it, by talking and sharing views and doubts with each other helps to cope with real life situations and learn frequently better as they get different views from different students with logical reasons. Secondly, co-educational schools induce respect and belongings between boys and girls. To elaborate it, learning and educating in mixed schools cope up boys to talk to girls in a respectful manner which reduce discrimination among them. Moreover, this schools also teaches manners and to manage their behavior so that girls did not face any kind of harassment and feel safe in both in their own house as this teaches them ethic values and cultures.
Nevertheless, educated separately in single-sex schools has both pros and cons. The first and foremost reason is that there are few distraction. To clarify it, students may focus more on their daily lessons instead of talking with each other and are free from peer-pressure. However, tailored teaching are essential in single-sex schools as by adopting this practice the teachers can adapt lessons to fit perceived developmental or teaching tendencies common to one gender. Educated separately in single-sex schools helps students to be more confident and excel in subjects like math and science without any disruption on the basis of gender.
To conclude, although there are several benefits of latter point of view such as free from peer-pressure, and tailored teaching yet according to me girls and boys ought to educate together in co-educational or mixed schools it helps them to adopt ethic values and create real-life skills experience.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt, but the position is somewhat contradictory. You state in the introduction that you agree with single-sex education 'to a large extent,' yet the body paragraphs focus heavily on the benefits of co-education, and your conclusion ultimately argues in favor of mixed schools. This inconsistency makes your position unclear. While you provide relevant ideas, such as 'real-life skills' for co-education and 'tailored teaching' for single-sex schools, the development is somewhat repetitive. To improve, ensure your stance is consistent throughout the essay and dedicate more space to explaining the 'why' behind your arguments rather than just listing them.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use cohesive devices like 'To commence with,' 'Nevertheless,' and 'To conclude' to signal transitions. However, some of these transitions feel mechanical or slightly unnatural, such as 'in forthcoming fragments.' Additionally, the referencing is sometimes unclear; for example, in the final paragraph, you refer to 'latter point of view' in a way that is slightly confusing given the preceding arguments. Improving the flow between sentences and ensuring that pronouns and reference words clearly point to their antecedents will help achieve a higher band score.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'undeniable,' 'discrimination,' and 'tailored teaching.' However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors that hinder precision. For example, 'pensive concern' is used incorrectly (pensive means thoughtful/sad, not serious), and 'induce respect and belongings' is not standard English. You also use 'educated' as a noun phrase in 'educated separately,' which is grammatically incorrect. To improve, focus on learning the specific contexts in which words are used and avoid over-complicating your language with words you are not entirely confident using.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('this schools also teaches'), incorrect verb forms ('girls did not face' instead of 'do not face'), and awkward phrasing ('in this regards'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement would significantly improve your accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.