Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-26
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays , In many schools of the world , both gender of boys and girls are studying together in co education institutes.Many individuals argued that both genders are benifitited if they studied in a seperate school .In this essay i will identify that why i disagree with this view.
First of all , many people beleived that boys and girls should study in separate schools. But as far as i strongly beleived that they should learnt thier education from unisex educational institutes.Since, when girls and boys studies together, there will be more chances for both to take part in all kind of activities equally. So , there will be equality and justice in both genders.when girls compete with boys , their confidence will boost .For instance, In Pakistan , there was all male prime minister But when a women who is benazir bhutto take part in politics ,She became the first women Prime Minister of Pakistan .Subsequently , Significant numbers of women take part in politics and comppete with mens.
Furthermore , when both learners study together at a very young age So, there will be less chances for attraction . Because when boys and girls became teengers ,They devoleped attraction to the oppisite gender.Consequently , they become involved in illegal habits . In addition to this , they lack control of feelings Owning to this , thats why they should learn together ..
On the other hand, some people agree with that there should be separate educational institutes . they think this because , they know that if a girl or a boy is involved in a bad relationship , It would be a disaster for honourable family. Moreover, it affects the physical and mental condition of both .
To sum up , studying in a separate schools will not give much confidence , However ,Co educational institutes give freedom , independence .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a personal position against single-sex education and providing supporting arguments. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For example, the writer mentions that co-educational environments boost confidence and promote equality, and attempts to illustrate this with the example of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan. Yet, the link between co-education and political leadership is not fully articulated or persuasive. The counter-argument paragraph is also brief and underdeveloped. Overall, the response meets the basic requirements of the task by presenting a clear stance with relevant, albeit simple, main points, aligning best with Band 5.5 descriptors rounded to a 6.0 for covering all parts of the task with a clear position.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement, with a clear introduction and conclusion. However, the paragraphing and use of cohesive devices show significant weaknesses. Spacing errors are frequent around punctuation marks, such as commas and periods. Furthermore, the progression of ideas is occasionally disjointed; for instance, the third paragraph abruptly jumps from discussing adolescent attraction to concluding that 'thats why they should learn together,' contradicting the preceding warning about illegal habits. While cohesive devices like 'First of all,' 'Furthermore,' and 'To sum up' are used to structure the text, referencing and logical sequencing are sometimes faulty, making this characteristic of a Band 5.0 performance.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate basic ideas about education. However, there are numerous word choice and spelling inaccuracies, such as 'benifitited', 'seperate', 'beleived', 'learnt thier education', and 'teengers'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items like 'unisex educational institutes' and 'disaster for honourable family', but these demonstrate noticeable errors in collocation and style. Because the errors in spelling and word formation are frequent and occasionally draw the reader's attention, the response fits well within the Band 5.0 descriptor.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but grammatical control is weak. There are frequent errors in tense usage, article placement, and sentence structure, such as 'In this essay i will identify that why i disagree' and 'when a women who is benazir bhutto take part in politics'. Punctuation is also poorly managed, with erratic capitalization of pronouns and erratic spacing before punctuation marks. Although the meaning can generally be deciphered despite these errors, the high frequency of grammatical slips prevents the score from reaching a higher band, placing it firmly at Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.