Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In this modern era, education of childern is being question with believes that girls school should be kept separate from boys school for the benefits of individuals. I totally disagree with this thought as student together make a friendly relation between boys and girls and help them to make healthy competition in sports and education.
To start with, Education play a vitial role in shaping future. Educating teenagers thogether under a one roof helps governments to invest less amount of money to build different building regards to genders. However, this amount can be spent to provide better facilities to all childern by giving high technologies equipment like smartboards, projectors and laptops, which help them to develop innovate skills. For example, Gujarat goverments had saved money in 2020 by making all school gender friendly and distributes Ipads to all students.
Furthermore, teaching students of all gender together can develop a friendly relation between them which later helps them to develop a good competition in study and sports. For instance, 25% of educational instution had seen development in student after being taught together in instutation. Also, gender equality will reduce after being educating girls and boys together. Nowadays, there is no gender equality between youngsters, as education was being under one roof regardsless of gender equality.
In conclusion, I totally d
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position against single-sex schools, arguing instead for co-education based on social and economic benefits. However, the length requirement has not been met, as the essay is 219 words, falling short of the 250-word minimum. This under-length limitation directly impacts the fullness of development. While the introduction and body paragraphs present relevant ideas such as economic efficiency for governments and the fostering of healthy competition, these points remain somewhat brief and under-developed. For instance, the claim regarding gender equality becomes confusing due to awkward phrasing ('gender equality will reduce after being educating girls and boys together'). Because the response is under-length and certain ideas lack full extension, it aligns best with a Band 5 for this criterion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a basic overall structure with clear paragraphing, including an introduction, two body paragraphs, and an incomplete conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'To start with', 'However', 'For example', and 'Furthermore' are employed to signpost the progression of ideas, though their use is at times repetitive or mechanical. Logical progression is visible between sentences, but referencing and referencing chains are occasionally unclear, particularly in the third paragraph where the argument about gender equality becomes convoluted. Paragraphing is attempted appropriately, but the abrupt termination of the essay at the conclusion stage limits the overall coherence. These features place the response firmly at Band 6.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student attempts an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, incorporating terms like 'co-educational', 'vitial', 'economical', and 'innovate'. However, there are numerous spelling and word-choice errors that detract from precision, such as 'childern' instead of children, 'believes' instead of beliefs, 'thogether', 'vitial', and 'instution'. Collocations and word forms are frequently inaccurate, for example, 'building regards to genders', 'innovate skills', and 'gouverments'. While the intended meaning is usually retrievable, the density of lexical errors and limited control over less common vocabulary restrict the score to Band 5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The text contains a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some attempt at subordination using clauses with 'as', 'which', and 'while'. However, control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the response, including subject-verb agreement issues ('education of childern is being question'), incorrect verb forms ('education was being under one roof'), and prepositional errors ('under a one roof'). Furthermore, the response trails off incompletely in the final sentence ('I totally d'), which is a structural breakdown. These persistent errors and the limited error-free sentences place the response at Band 5.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.