Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The debate between co educational and single sex schooling remains a central topic in modern education. While some argue that seperating boys and girls yields better academic outcomes. I believe that mixed schools generally provides a more balanced foundation for young adult life,though single sex settings can offer unique academics advantages.

On the one hand, co educational environment mirrors the real world. In daily life, men and womens must collaberate closely in workplace and communities. Mixed schools help students develop vital skills, emotional intelligence early on. For example, boys and girls working together on group projects learn to respect eachother perspective and break down gender barriers. Consequently, this environment naturally prepares them for smooth integration into adult society.

On the other hand, single sex schools can minimize social distractions. During adolescence,teenagers often experience peer pressure and liking distrations that can cause their academic focus. By seperating genders,schools can create a more concentrated learning environment. Furthermore,single sex education can challenge traditional gender steretypes. For instance, girls on all female schools are more confident to pursue subjects like physics and advanced mathematics, which are traditionally dominated by boys in mixed classrooms.

In conclusion, I partially agree that single sex schools offers distinct benefits, in terms of academic focus and gender stereotypes.However,the social advantages of co educational schools cannot be overlokked. Mixed schools offer invaluable preperation for the reality of the real professional world. Ultimately, a balanced approach that incorporates the strengths of both systems is ideal for comprehensive youth development.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position throughout regarding co-educational and single-sex schooling. Main ideas are relevant, such as the social preparation provided by mixed schools and the academic focus found in single-sex environments, meeting the requirements of the lower band fully. However, some ideas are slightly under-developed; for instance, the point regarding gender stereotypes could have been explored with deeper elaboration. Additionally, a minor limitation to note is that the response falls two words short of the minimum 250-word requirement, which prevents it from achieving a higher score. To reach the next level, all main arguments need to be more fully extended and supported with richer examples, while ensuring the word count comfortably exceeds the minimum threshold.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear logical progression throughout. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, with distinct introductions to opposing viewpoints and a clear concluding stance. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as "On the one hand," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion." However, cohesion is at times a bit mechanical, and referencing or linking between sentences can occasionally feel slightly abrupt, such as the transition into the discussion on gender stereotypes. To move to the next band, the flow between sentences and paragraphs needs to be smoother and more natural, making the underlying logical relationships even more transparent without relying on formulaic transition markers.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as "adolescence," "peer pressure," and "comprehensive youth development." However, there are several noticeable errors in spelling, word choice, and word form, including "co educational" instead of co-educational, "seperating" and "seperating genders" instead of separating, "collaberate" instead of collaborate, "men and womens" instead of men and women, "eachother" instead of each other, "distrations" instead of distractions, and "steretypes" instead of stereotypes. These errors show an adequate ability to communicate the main message, but they prevent a higher score due to inaccuracy in less common vocabulary. To improve, the writer must focus on precise word formation, correct spelling, and natural collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing structures such as concessive clauses ("While some argue that...") and relative clauses. There are some errors in grammar and punctuation, such as the sentence fragment "While some argue that separating boys and girls yields better academic outcomes. I believe..." where a comma should replace the period, and a subject-verb agreement slip in "mixed schools generally provides." Despite these issues, the grammatical errors rarely impede communication. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to demonstrate a greater variety of complex structures with more frequent error-free sentences and tighter control over punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.