Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Knowledge is the stair to success , knowledge comes from education . Eduaction is really important for everybody , it is the first step towards the growth.Each human should be educated in a good environment .The educational environment plays a key role in learning.Everyone should be provided equal education , irrespective of there cast, gender and religion.

Some people argue that , girls and boys should be educated separately in order to gain better education. They believe so , it creates more safer environent for both the genders . They feel more comfortable and confident with the same sex people. As well as it is more practical for students and educators to implement certain teaching criterias . Not only this , also there would be fewer distractions , students can be more focused and relaxed , the peer presuure would also be reduced , the social anxiety can be less in the same sex compared to the different sex. Students would not be wasting their time building relationships and worrying about those.They would have clear goals and can study without much problems .

But , what i believe is everybody should be eduacted in a same school . It would be more realiable , as parents wouldn't have to worry about searching good single-sex schools , it would be more convienient for government as there would be comparatively less expenditure.It would help students experience the environment that they would be going to work , as offices , companies have employees of every sex. Their communication can be improved ,students can learn how to coomunicate with people of different genders .Both boys and girls can work in teams and come up with more enovative ideas.Studying together can reduce stereotypes and encourage mutual respect.

In conclusion, Some people may think it is better to study in single-sex school due to less distractions and peer pressure , but i believe there are more benefits of studying in a co-educational school , it breakes sterotype and creates healthier environment , mutual respect and an idea how to work together .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout, which fully satisfies the requirements of the lower band while showing glimpses of higher-level development. The introduction outlines the general topic, and subsequent paragraphs present arguments for both single-sex schools and co-educational settings. However, some ideas remain under-developed rather than fully extended. For instance, the point about practicality and teaching criteria in single-sex environments is mentioned briefly without concrete explanation or examples. Similarly, while the benefits of co-education are stated, such as improving communication and reducing stereotypes, these points would benefit from further elaboration and specific supporting details. Despite these occasional lapses in depth, the main arguments are relevant to the prompt, and the writer maintains a clear personal viewpoint favouring mixed schooling until the conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing that separates the introduction, the opposing view, the writer's perspective, and the conclusion. Ideas are logically sequenced, moving from a general statement to arguments for single-sex education, followed by arguments for co-education, and finally wrapping up. However, cohesion at the sentence level is occasionally mechanical or faulty. The writer relies heavily on basic comma splices and repetitive transitional patterns, such as starting multiple consecutive sentences with 'It would be' or 'They feel'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly with pronoun usage like 'They believe so , it creates', where the cohesive ties are loose. Paragraph transitions are present, but more sophisticated cohesive devices and varied referencing would be required to achieve a higher level of organization and smoother progression throughout the essay.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, providing enough range to communicate the main ideas simply. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items, such as 'convienient', 'inovative', and 'sterotype', but these are accompanied by noticeable spelling and word choice errors. For example, terms like 'environent', 'criterias', 'presuure', and 'eduacted' indicate issues with word form and spelling. There are also problems with collocation and word choice, such as 'building relationships' in this academic context or 'teaching criterias' where the plural form is non-standard. While these inaccuracies do not completely impede communication, they restrict the lexical range and precision, placing the vocabulary firmly at this level where errors in spelling and word choice recur frequently.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some capability to construct longer sentences, such as 'In conclusion, Some people may think it is better to study in single-sex school due to less distractions and peer pressure , but i believe there are more benefits...'. However, there are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and article usage that prevent a higher rating. Punctuation is particularly problematic, featuring persistent spaces before commas and frequent comma splices linking independent clauses, such as 'Eduaction is really important for everybody , it is the first step towards the growth.' Additionally, there are articles missing or misused, such as 'searching good single-sex schools' and 'in a same school'. Although the reader can discern the intended meaning, the frequency of these grammatical slips and punctuation inaccuracies means the writing falls short of a largely error-free profile.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.